A metanyelvi tudatosság elemeit vizsgáló kutatások közül napjainkig kevés figyelem irányult a morfológiai tudatosságra. Hazánkban még nem jelent meg átfogó szakirodalmi összefoglaló. A dolgozat célja az, hogy bemutassa és rendszerezze a morfológiai tudato
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2015.1.1Keywords:
morphological awareness, cognitive development, pedagogical evaluation, decoding (reading technique), text comprehensionAbstract
Research into elements of metalinguistic awareness has paid little attention to morphological
awareness so far. In Hungary, no comprehensive literature review has been published on this topic
yet. The aim of this study is to introduce and systematise international research on morphological
awareness. Morphological awareness is the ability to manipulate the smallest meaningful units
within a word, i.e. morphemes. Morphological elements appear in speech at the age of two-three
but acquiring them consciously can be dated to the school years. Awareness typically appears in
operations related to inflections, word formation, and compounding. Its importance can mainly
be detected in the fact that the development of this ability influences the performance of both
word reading and text comprehension. Its measurement and development is thus justifiable in
this country as well.
References
Adamikné Jászó Anna 2003. Csak az ember olvas. Az olvasás tanítása és lélektana. Tinta Könyvkiadó. Budapest.
Adamikné Jászó Anna 2006. Az olvasás múltja és jelene. Az olvasás grammatikai, pragmatikai és retorikai megközelítésben. Trezor Kiadó. Budapest.
Apel, Kenn – Diehm, Emily – Apel, Lynda 2013. Using Multiple Measures of Morphological Awareness to Assess Its Relation to Reading. Top Lang Disorders 1: 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318280f57b
Bencédy József – Fábián Pál – Rácz Endre – Velcsov Mártonné 1968. A mai magyar nyelv. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.
Berninger, Virginia W. – Abbott, Robert D. – Nagy, William – Carlisle, Joanne 2010. Growth phonological, orthographic and morphological awareness in Grade 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2: 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6
Blomert, Leo – Csépe Valéria 2012. Az olvasástanulás és -mérés pszichológiai alapjai. In: Csapó Benő – Csépe Valéria (szerk.): Tartalmi keretek az olvasás diagnosztikus értékeléséhez. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó. Budapest. 17–85.
Bohács Krisztina 2010. A dinamikus értékelés. Magyar Pedagógia 4: 311–328.
Carlisle, Joanne F. 2000. Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: impact on reading. Reading and Writing 3: 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604
Carlisle, Joanne F. 2010. Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Reasearch Quarterly 4: 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5
Carlisle, Joanne F. – Fleming, Jane 2003. Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading 3: 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_3
Carlisle, Joanne F. – Stone, C. Addison 2005. Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly 4: 428–449. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3
Casalis, Séverine – Louis-Alexandre, Marie-France 2000. Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing 3: 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648
Deacon, S. Hélène 2011. Sounds, letters and meanings: the independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading 4: 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01496.x
Deacon, S. Hélène – Benere, Jenna – Pasquarella, Adrian 2012. Reciprocal relationship: children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology 6: 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029474
Deacon, S. Hélène – Kirby, John R. 2004. Morphological awareness: Just „more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics 2: 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110
Foorman, Barbara R. – Petscher, Yaacov – Bishop, M. Denise 2012. The incremental variance of morphological knowledge to reading comprehension in grades 3-10 beyond prior reading comprehension, spelling, and text reading efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences 6: 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.009
Goldenberg, Claude – Tolar, Tammy D. – Reese, Leslie – Francis, David J. – Bazán, Antonio Ray – Mejía-Arauz, Rebeca 2014. How important is teaching phonemic awareness to children learning to read in Spanish? American Educational Research Journal 3: 604–633. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214529082
Hatcher, Peter J. – Hulme, Charles – Snowling, Margaret J. 2004. Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2: 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00225.x
Huey, Edmund Burke 1908. The psychology and pedagogy of reading. The Macmillan Company. New York.
Kemp, Nenagh 2006. Children’s spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing 7: 737–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9001-6
Kieffer, Michael J. – Lesaux, Nonie K. 2012. Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the english reading comprehension of native english, spanish, filipino, and vietnamese speakers. Language Learning 4: 1170–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00722.x
Kirby, John R. – Deacon, S. Hélène – Bowers, Peter N. – Izenberg, Leah – Wade-Woolley, Lesly – Parrila, Rauno 2012. Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing 2: 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5
Kruk, Richard S. – Bergman, Krista 2013. The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1: 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.014
Ku, Yu-Min – Anderson, Richard C. 2003. Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing 5: 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024227231216
Kuo, Li-jen – Anderson, Richard C. 2006. Morphological awareness and learning to read: a cross-language perspective. Eduational Psychologist 3: 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
Ladányi Mária 2007. Produktivitás és analógia a szóképzésben: elvek és esetek. (Segédkönyvek a nyelvészet tanulmányozásához 76.) Tinta Könyvkiadó. Budapest.
Lam, Katie – Chen, Xi – Geva, Esther – Lou, Yang C. – Li, Hong 2012. The role of morphological awareness in reading achievement among young Chinese-speaking English language learners: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing 8: 1847–1872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9329-4
Larsen, Jennifer A. – Nippold, Marilyn A. 2007. Morphological analysis in school-age children: Dynamic assessment of a word learning strategy. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools 3: 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/021)
Lengyel Zsolt 1981. A gyermeknyelv. Gondolat Kiadó. Budapest.
Lukács Ágnes 2001. Szabályok és kivételek: a kettős modell érvényessége a magyarban. In: Pléh Csaba – Lukács Ágnes (szerk.): A magyar morfológia pszicholingvisztikája. Osiris Kiadó. Budapest. 119–152.
McBride-Chang, Catherine – Cho, Jeung-Ryeul – Liu, Hongyun – Wagner, Richard K. – Shu, Hua – Zhou, Aibao – Cheuk, Cecilia S-M. – Muse, Andrea 2005. Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2: 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.009
Morris, Joanna – Porter, James H. – Grainger, Jonathan – Holcomb, Philip J. 2011. Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes 4–6: 558–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.495482
Pike, Katherine 2013. Early dynamic assessment of morphological awareness and early literacy achievement: A feasibility study. MA dissertation. Utah State University.
Pittas, Evdokia – Nunes, Terezinha 2014. The relation between morphological awareness and reading and spelling in Greek: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing 8: 1507–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9503-6
Plaut, David C. – Gonnermann, Laura M. 2000. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes 4–5: 445–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119661
Pléh Csaba 2000. A magyar morfológia pszicholingvisztikai aspektusai. In: Kiefer Ferenc (szerk.): Strukturális magyar nyelvtan. 3. kötet. Morfológia. Akadémiai Kiadó. Budapest. 951–1020.
Ramirez, Gloria – Chen, Xi – Geva, Esther – Kiefer, Heidi 2010. Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing 3–4: 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
Rathvon, Natalie 2004. Early reading assessment:a practitioner’s handbook. The Guilford Press. New York.
Roman, Alexandra A. – Kirby, John R. – Parrila, Rauno K. – Wade-Woolley, Lesly – Deacon, S. Hélène 2009. Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1: 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.004
Rueckl, Jay G. – Raveh, Michal 1999. The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language 1–2: 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2106
Snow, Catherine E. – Burns, Susan M. – Griffin, Peg (eds.) 1998. Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press. Washington.
Tóth László 2003. Narratívum és megértés: Pszichológiai sajátosságok a narratív szöveg megértésének fejlődésében az általános iskolai tanulóknál. Habilitációs értekezés. Debreceni Egyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kar Pszichológiai Intézet, Debrecen.
Wolf, Maryanne 2008. Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. Harper Perennial. New York.
Wolter, J. A. 2011, July. Dynamic Assessment of Morphological Awareness and Literacy. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the Society for Scientific Studies in Reading, St. Petes, FL.
Wood, Clare – Connelly, Vincent (eds.) 2009. Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling. Routledge. Abingdon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877838
Ziegler, Johannes C. – Goswami, Usha 2005. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading arcoss languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 1: 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 First Language Pedagogy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of articles published in the journal belongs to the author. The journal has the right of first publication. The published work is licensed under Creative Commons License “Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC 4.0). This means that copying, redistribution, remixing, transformation and building upon the published work is allowed for any purpose except commercial purposes as long as proper credit is given to the author, a link to the licence is provided, and any changes made to the original work are indicated.
The journal Anyanyelv-pedagógia [First Language Pedagogy] does not charge authors any fees for the processing, submission, or publication of articles. All writings published in the journal become freely accessible immediately after their publication.