Dichotic tests for students with learning disabilities

Dichotic tests for students with learning disabilities

Authors

  • Ildikó Désfalvi Újbuda Pedagogical Service, Budapest, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2019.2.2

Keywords:

dichotic test, binaural integration, learning difficulties

Abstract

The development of the left or right brain hemisphere′s dominance (lateralization) is essential for language development. Dichotic test is a relatively fast and simple procedure for the investigation of lateralization and binaural integration (listening with two ears). The present study shows how kindergarten children with learning disabilities the perform in the dichotic perception tests. Results of an experiment with twenty children with learning disability risk and twenty normally developing children at the kindergarten show that children at risk perform significantly weaker compared to the children in the control group. The difference between the two groups is larger in case of the left ear. This might indicate that asymmetry is abnormally large between the perception of the two ears. The difference between the two ears may lead to difficulties in speech perception and speech comprehension. Defining age norms in these dichotic tests may contribute to the differential diagnosis of atypical language development.

References

Baddeley, Alan. 2001. Az emberi emlékezet. Osiris Kiadó. Budapest.

Bellis, Terry J. 1996. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting. Singular. San Diego, CA.

Broadbent, Donald E. 1956. Successive responses to simultaneous stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology 8: 145–152.

Bryden, M. Phil 1988. An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization, In: Hugdahl, Kenneth (szerk.) Handbook of Dichotic Listening: Theory, Methods, and Research. 1–44.

Csépe Valéria ‒ Győri Miklós ‒ Ragó Anett 2007. Észlelés és figyelem. Osiris Kiadó. Budapest.

Gósy Mária 1994. A mondatértés és a szövegértés összefüggései. In: Gósy Mária (szerk.) Beszédkutatás. MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet. Budapest. 94–120.

Gósy Mária 1995. A beszédpercepció folyamatának zavarai és fejlesztése. BGGYTF. Budapest.

Gósy Mária 2005. Pszicholingvisztika. Osiris Kiadó. Budapest.

Gósy Mária 2009. Gyermekek anyanyelvi kompetenciájáról. Gyógypedagógiai Szemle37(2–3): 81–88.

Hámori József 2005. Az emberi agy asszimmetriái. Dialóg Campus Kiadó. Budapest.

Hugdahl, Kenneth 1988. Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research. John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY.

Hugdahl, Kenneth 2011. Fifty years of dichotic listening research – still going and going and… Brain Cognition 76: 211–213.

Hynd, George W. – John E. Obrzut 1977. Effects of grade level and sex on the magnitude of the dichotic ear advantage. Neuropsychologia 15: 689–692.

Kimura, Doreen 1961. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology 15: 156–165.

Kimura, Doreen 1967. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 3: 163–178.

Kinsbourne, Marcel 1970. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. ActaPsychologia 33: 193–201.

Krepsz Valéria – Gósy Mária 2018. A dichotikus szóészlelés életkorspecifikus jellemzői. In: Gósy Mária (szerk.) Beszédkutatás. MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet. Budapest. 158–185.

Masterton, R. Bruce ‒ Imig, Thomas J. 1984. Neural mechanisms of sound localization.Annual Review of Physiology 46: 275–280.

Moncrieff, Deborah W. 2011. Dichotic listening in children: Age-related changes in direction and magnitude of ear advantage. Brain Cognition 76: 316–322.

Moncrieff, Deborah W. – Wertz, Diane 2008. Auditory rehabilitation for interaural asymmetry: Preliminary evidence of improved dichotic listening performance following intensive training. International Journal of Audiology 47: 84–97.

Moncrieff, Deborah W. – Wilson, Richard H. 2009. Recognition of randomly presented one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digits by children and young adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20: 58–70.

Moncrieff, Deborah W. ‒ Cohen, David ‒ Porter, Sally 2013. The psychoactive effects of psychiatric medications: The elephant in the room. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 45: 409–415.

Moncrieff, Deborah W. – Keith, William – Abramson, Maria – Swann, Alicia 2016. Diagnosis of amblyaudia in children referred for auditory processing assessment. International Journal of Audiology 55: 333–345.

Moncrieff Deborah W. – Keith, William – Abramson, Maria – Swann, Alicia 2017. Evidence of binaural integration benefits following ARIA training for children and adolescents diagnosed with amblyaudia. International Journal of Audology 56: 580–588.

Musiek, Frank E. 1983. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the dichotic digit test revisited. Ear and Hearing 4(2): 79‒83.

Obrzut, John E. 1979. Dichotic listening and bisensory memory skills in qualitatively diverse dyslexic readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities 12: 304‒314.

Obrzut, John E. – Hynd, George W. – Obrzut, Ann – Leitgeb, James L. 1980. Time sharing and dichotic listening asymmetry in normal and learning-disabled children. Brain and Language 11: 181–194.

Obrzut, John E. – Conrad, Pamela F. – Boliek, Carol A. 1989. Verbal and nonverbal auditoryprocessing among left- and right-handed good readers and reading-disabled children. Neuropsychologia 27: 1357–1371.

Obrzut, John E. ‒ Mahoney, Emery B. 2011. Use of the dichotic listening technique with learning disabilities. Brain and Cognition 76(2): 323–331.

Pléh Csaba – Lukács Ágnes 2003. Nyelv, evolúció és az agy. In: Pléh Csaba – Gulyás Balázs – Kovács Gyula (szerk.): Kognitív idegtudomány. Osiris Kiadó. Budapest.

Sekuler, Randolph – Blake, Robert 2004. Észlelés. Osiris Kiadó. Budapest.

Stevens, Stanley S. ‒ Newman, Edwin B. 1934. The localization of pure tones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 20: 593–596.

Studdert-Kennedy, Michael – Shankweiler, Donald 1970. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 48: 579–594.

Willeford, James A. 1977. Assessing central auditory behavior in children: A test battery approach. In: Kieth, Robert W. (ed.): Central auditory dysfunction. Grune and Stratton. New York. 43‒72.

Downloads

Published

2019. 06. 30.

How to Cite

Désfalvi, I. (2019). Dichotic tests for students with learning disabilities. First Language Pedagogy, 12(2.), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2019.2.2

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...