The Application of Ego-Network-Centred Cards and Storylines in the Practice of Educational Research

Szerzők

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31074/gyntf.2025.3.181.196

Kulcsszavak:

ego-network-centred cards, storyline technique, qualitative research, teacher thinking research

Absztrakt

In the wake of the profound social and economic shifts following the COVID
-19 pandemic, qualitative research faces the urgent challenge of adapting its methodological tools to a rapidly changing world. This study responds to that challenge by examining how innovative and revitalized qualitative approaches can enhance the credibility and depth of educational research in contemporary contexts. Emphasis is placed on the need for indirect methods, especially in studies involving teachers, teacher trainees, and parents, where conventional, passive roles in research are shifting toward more active and engaged participant involvement. Two methods – ego-network-centred card and storyline – are introduced in the study, which have been applied in the investigation of teachers’ thinking, but are adaptable to various educational contexts, including both institutional and individual research. These methods are presented in a practical, user-focused framework, prioritizing their reproducibility and providing detailed guidance for their application. In order to this, methodology is structured around the methods’ history, advantages, challenges, and comprehensive examples of their use in educational research.

Letöltések

Letölthető adat még nem áll rendelkezésre.

Hivatkozások

Antonucci, T. C. (1986). Measuring Social Support Networks: The Hierarchical Mapping Technique. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44876253

Bell, S., & Harkness, S. (2006). Storyline: Promoting Language Across the Curriculum. UK Literacy Association.

Bernreuter, R. G. (1933). Validity of the personality inventory. Personnel Journal, 11, 383–386.

Birks, M., Mills, J., Francis, K., & Chapman, Y. (2009). A thousand words paint a picture: The use of storyline in grounded theory research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(5), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987109104675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987109104675

Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society, Second Edition, with a new preface. Blackwell Publishing.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.

Farley-Ripple, E., Yun, J.-Y., & Farley-Ripple, E. N. (2021). An Ego-Network Approach to Understanding Educator and School Ties to Research: From Basic Statistics to Profiles of Capacity. Delaware. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78755-4_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78755-4_7

Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative and the Self as Relationship. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 17–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60223-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60223-3

Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.

Herz, A., Peters, L., & Truschkat, I. (2015). How to Do Qualitative Structural Analysis: The Qualitative Interpretation of Network Maps and Narrative Interviews. http://www.qualitative-research.net/

Hizli Alkan, S. (2021). Curriculum making as relational practice: A qualitative ego-network approach. Curriculum Journal, 32(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.98 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.98

Hollstein, B. (2014). Mixed Methods Social Networks Research. Design and Applications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264971878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139227193.003

Hollstein, B., & Pfeffer, J. (2010). Netzwerkkarten als Instrument zur Erhebung egozentrierter Netzwerke. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265195974

Hollstein, B., Töpfer, T., & Pfeffer, J. (2020). Collecting egocentric network data with visual tools: A comparative study. Network Science, 8(2), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2020.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2020.4

Horváth, D., & Mitev, A. (2015). Alternatív kvalitatív kutatási kézikönyv. Alinea Kiadó.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

McNaughton, M. J., & Mitchell, P. J. (2016, Eds.). Storyline: A creative approach to learning and teaching. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2013). A decade of dedication: Giving, giving, giving… and giving up teaching. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 35(4), 225–251. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/1143

Orland, L. (2010). What’s in a Line? Exploration of a research and reflection tool. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713698715

Prell, C. (2011). Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology. Sage Publications.

Qamariah, H., & Hercz, M. (2025). The Impact of Professional Development Programs on English as a Foreign Language Instructors in Higher Education Institutions. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081071

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE.

Sántha, K. (2015). Trianguláció a pedagógiai kutatásban. Eötvös József Könyvkiadó.

Sántha, K. (2017). Network cards as a way of discovering the reflective thinking of teacher trainees: The relevance of a qualitative analysis. PedActa, 7(1), 13–18.

Sántha, K. (2022). Kvalitatív tartalomelemzés. Eötvös József Könyvkiadó.

Sántha, K. (2023). Exploring the Reflective Thinking of Teachers with Structured Unstandardised Network Cards. The New Educational Review, 72(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2023.72.2.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.72.2.19

Sántha, K., & Malomsoki-Sántha, Á. (2023). Methodological Aspects for Applied Linguistic Research-Mixed Methods, Triangulation. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 15(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2023-0013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2023-0013

Sonu, D. (2022). Possibilities for using visual drawing with student-teachers: Linking childhood memories to future teaching selves. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103599, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103599

Zank, I. (2024). Én-központú hálózatok elemzése a tanárjelöltek tanítási tevékenységéről való vélekedések aspektusából. In Varga, A., Fridrich, M., & Arató, F. (Eds.), Áttekintés II. Tanulmánykötet – Válogatás az MTA PAB Pedagógiai Munkabizottsága és a PTE BTK Neveléstudományi Intézete kutatóinak tanulmányaiból (pp. 231–247). Pécsi Tudományegyetem Bölcsészet- és Társadalomtudományi Kar Neveléstudományi Intézet.

Downloads

Megjelent

2025-12-16

Hogyan kell idézni

Pozsonyi, F., Qamariah, H., Hercz, M., & Sántha, K. (2025). The Application of Ego-Network-Centred Cards and Storylines in the Practice of Educational Research. Gyermeknevelés Tudományos Folyóirat, 13(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.31074/gyntf.2025.3.181.196