Supporting In-Service Teachers in Selecting Digital Learning Materials Based on Didactic Criteria

Szerzők

  • Nikolett Sovák
  • András Lénárd

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31074/gyntf.2025.3.233.250

Kulcsszavak:

digital learning materials, primary education, didactics

Absztrakt

The aim of our study was to explore whether didactic criteria can support teachers in searching for digital learning materials, and how digital pedagogy is influenced by equipment availability, professional competence, and teachers’ attitudes toward digital resources. The results of an online questionnaire completed by in-service teachers (N=435) show that access to digital tools is generally ensured, and most teachers consciously integrate them into classroom practices. The use of digital learning materials is widespread and generally positively evaluated, although their perceived quality is heterogeneous, indicating a need for quality assurance and development. Correlation analyses revealed that digital tool use is primarily influenced by equipment availability and methodological competence, while teaching experience and students’ age are marginal factors. The demand for searching materials based on didactic criteria emerged as a relevant supporting function. The non-representative nature of the sample limits the generalizability of the findings. In summary, the integration of digital learning materials is largely determined by teachers’ methodological competencies and the availability of tools, while didactic-based search options provide additional opportunities for more specific classroom design.

Letöltések

Letölthető adat még nem áll rendelkezésre.

Hivatkozások

Balogh, L. (2007). A didaktika szemléletmód hatása a pedagógiai pszichológiára napjainkban [The impact of the didactic approach on pedagogical psychology today]. Pedagógusképzés, 5(1–2), 47–52.

Barkó, E. (1998). Kommunikatív didaktika [Communicative didactics]. Dinasztia Tankönyvkiadó.

Báthory, Z. (2006). Létezik még didaktika? [Does didactics still exist?] Pedagógus­képzés, 4(1–2), 53–54.

Berner, H. (2004). Az oktatás kompetenciái [The competencies of education]. Aula Könyvkiadó.

Buda, A. (2007). Létezik-e didaktika? [Does didactics exist?] Pedagógusképzés, 5(1–2), 53.

Falus, I. (1998, Ed.). Didaktika: Elméleti alapok a tanítás tanulásához [Didactics: Theoretical foundations for teaching and learning]. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.

Falus, I. & Szűcs, I. (2022, Eds.). A didaktika kézikönyve [The Handbook of Didactics]. Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634548454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634548454

Kárpáti, A. (1999). Digitális pedagógia [Digital pedagogy]. Új Pedagógiai Szemle, 49(4), 76–89.

Lénárd, A. (2014). A didaktika helyzete a neveléstudományon belül [The status of didactics within educational sciences]. In Lénárd, A. (Ed.), Fókuszban a tanuló [Focus on the learner] (pp. 32–38). ELTE TÓK.

Lénárd, A. (2017). A digitális tananyagok kiválasztásának pedagógiai háttere: Egy optimális rendszer jellemzőinek bemutatása [Pedagogical background for selecting digital learning materials: Characteristics of an optimal system]. In J. T. Karlovitz (Ed.), Válogatott tanulmányok a pedagógiai elmélet és szakmódszertanok köréből [Selected Studies in Pedagogical Theory and Methodology] (pp. 371–374). International Research Institute.

Martinkó, J. (2007). A didaktika alulnézetben [Didactics from a bottom-up perspective]. Pedagógusképzés, 5(1–2), 55–57.

Nahalka, I. (2002). Hogyan alakul ki a tudás a gyermekekben? [How knowledge develops in children]. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.

OECD. (2023). Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

Ollé, J. (2007). Mérföldkő vagy fordulópont? [Milestone or turning point?] Pedagógusképzés, 5(1–2), 44.

Sjöström, J. & Rydberg, C. (2018). Towards transdisciplinary Didaktik – didactic modelling of complex controversial issues teaching for reflexive Bildung and sustainability. In I. Eilks, S. Markic & B. Ralle (Eds.), Building Bridges Across Disciplines for Transformative Education and a Sustainable Future (pp. 3–15.). Shaker.

Trgalová, J., Donevska-Todorova, A. & Edson, A. J. (2024). Evaluation of digital resources: The “how” and “what for”. In Pepin, B., Gueudet, G. & Choppin, J. (Eds.), Handbook of digital resources in mathematics education (pp. 1203-1230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45667-1_45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45667-1_45

Uljens, M. (2023). Bildung-Centred Non-Affirmative School Didactics. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Non-Affirmative Theory of Education and Bildung (pp. 95-136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30551-1_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30551-1_5

Downloads

Megjelent

2025-12-16

Hogyan kell idézni

Sovák, N., & Lénárd, A. (2025). Supporting In-Service Teachers in Selecting Digital Learning Materials Based on Didactic Criteria. Gyermeknevelés Tudományos Folyóirat, 13(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.31074/gyntf.2025.3.233.250