Évf. 14 szám 1 (2022)
Tanulmányok

The Exegetical Tradition of the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra

Imre Hamar
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Bio

Megjelent 2022-11-22

Kulcsszavak

  • Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra,
  • kínai buddhizmus,
  • Huayan-iskola,
  • Dilun-iskola,
  • Vasubandhu,
  • Daśabhūmika-sūtra,
  • Fazang 法藏
  • ...Tovább
    Kevesebb

Hogyan kell idézni

Hamar, I. (2022). The Exegetical Tradition of the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra. Távol-Keleti Tanulmányok, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2022.1.1

Absztrakt

Buddhāvatasaka-sūtra az egyik legjelentősebb Mahāyāna sūtra Kelet-Ázsiában, amely alapján a kínai buddhizmus egyik iskolája, a Huayan megalkotta sajátos tanításait. Ebben a cikkben bemutatjuk, hogy Kínában miként kezdődött el ennek a műnek az egzegetikai tanulmányozása a Dilun iskola tudós szerzetesei által, akik a Buddhāvatasaka-sūtra egyik fejezetét, a Daśabhūmika-sūtrát tanulmányozták Vasubandhu kommentárjának segítségével, és hogyan érte el a csúcspontját a Tang-kori mesterek által, akikek később a Huayan-iskola pátriákáiként tiszteltek. 

Hivatkozások

  1. Andrews, Susan – Chen Jinhua – Kuan Guang (eds.) 2020. The Transnational Cult of Mount Wutai. Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Series: Studies on East Asian Religions, Volume: 2. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004419872
  2. Birnbaum, Raoul 1983. Studies on the Mysteries of Mañjuśrī. Boulder: Society for the Study of Chinese Religion Monograph no. 2.
  3. Cao Shibang曹仕邦1989. Zhongguo fojiao yijing shi lunji中國佛教譯經史論集 [Collection of Essays on the History of the Translation of Scriptures in Chinese Buddhism]. Taibei: Dongchu chubanshe.
  4. Chang, Ae Soon 張愛順 2004. “Ryōben no ‘Kegon kyō ron’ ni tsuite: Kyujangaku no hisshabon 霊弁の『華厳経論』について : 奎章閣の筆写本 [Lingbian’s Commentary on the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra: The Gyujanggak Manuscript].” Indogaku bukkyōgaku kenkyū 53.1: 178–183.
  5. Chen, Jinhua 2002. Monks and Monarchs, Kinship and Kingship: Tanqian in Sui Buddhism and Politics. Kyoto: Scuola Italiana di Studi sull’ Asia Orientale.
  6. Chengyi 成一 (ed.) 2001–04. Xinxiu huayanjing shuchao 新修華嚴經疏鈔 [New Subcommnetary on the Commentary to the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra]. Taibei: Huayan lianshe.
  7. Fang Guangchang 方廣錩 (ed.) 2003. Zangwai fojiao wenxian 藏外佛教文獻 [Extracanonical Buddhist Documents]. Vol. 8. Beijing: Zongjiao wenhua chubanshe.
  8. Gimello, Robert M. 1976. “Chih-Yen (602–668) And the Foundations of Hua-yen Buddhism”. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
  9. Hamar, Imre 2002. A Religious Leader in the Tang: Chengguan’s Biography (Studia Philologica Buddhica Occasional Paper Series 12). Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies of The International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies.
  10. Henderson, John B. 1991. Scripture, Canon, and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400861989
  11. Ishii, Kōsei 石井公成 1996. Kegon shisō no kenkyū華厳思想の研究 [A Study on the Huayan Thinking]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.
  12. Kanno Hiroshi 2003. Chinese Buddhist Sūtra Commentaries of the Early Period. Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 6: 301–320.
  13. Kanno Hiroshi 2007. A General Survey of Research Concerning Chinese Commentaries on Lotus sūtra. Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 10: 417–444.
  14. Kanno Hiroshi – Felbur, Rafal 2015. “Sūtra Commentaries in Chinese until the Tang period.” In: Jonathan Silk (ed.) Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Volume 1: Literature and Languages. Leiden: Brill, 450–466.
  15. Keng Ching 2009. “Yogâcāra Buddhism Transmitted or Transformed? Paramârtha (499–569) and His Chinese Interpreters.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
  16. Kim, Young-ho 1990. Tao-sheng’s Commentary on the Lotus Sūtra: A Study and Translation (Bibliothe¬ca-Indo-Buddhica 101). New York: State University of New York Press.
  17. Kimura, Kiyotaka 木村清孝 1977. Shoki Chūgoku kegon shisō no kenkyū 初期中國華厳思想の研究 [A Study on the Early Huayan Thinking]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.
  18. Liu, Ming-Wood 1994. Madhyamaka Thought in China. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004450332
  19. Nattier, Jan 2008. A Guide to the Earliest Chinese Buddhist Translations: Texts from the Eastern Han and Three Kingdoms Periods. Bibliotheca Philologica et Philosophica Buddhica, Vol. X. Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University.
  20. Ōchō, Enichi横超慧日1979. “Shakkyō shikō釈経史考. [An Examination of the History of Translating Scriptures]” In: Chūgoku bukkyō no kenkyū 中国仏教の研究 [A Study on Chinese Buddhism], vol. 3. Kyoto: Hōzokan (first published in Shina bukkyō shigaku (1937) 1: 75–110).
  21. Paul, Diana Y. 1984. Philosophy of Mind in Sixth-Century China: Paramārtha’s ‘Evolution of Consciousness’. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  22. Satō, Taishun 佐藤泰舜 1951. “Reiben no Kengon kyō ron ni tsuite 霊弁の華厳経論に就いて [Lingbian’s Commentary on the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra]” In: Miyamoto, Shōson 宮本正尊 et al. (eds.) Indo tetsugaku to bukkyō no sho mondai: Ui Hakuju hakushi kanreki kinen ronbunshū 印度哲学と仏教の諸問題:宇井伯寿博士還暦記念論文集 [Questions regarding Indian Philosophy and Buddhism: A Collection of Essays in the Memory of Dr. Ui Hakuju]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 249–279.
  23. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961a. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介. [An Introduction to the new Discovery of Lingbian’s Commentary on the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra]” Nanto bukkyō 9: 105–126.
  24. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961b. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 2 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (二).” Nanto bukkyō 10: 107–125.
  25. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961c. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 3 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (三).” Nanto bukkyō 11: 121–143.
  26. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961d. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 4 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (四).” Nanto bukkyō 12: 112–132.
  27. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961e. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 5 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (五).” Nanto bukkyō 13: 116–141.
  28. Sun Shaofei孙少飞2019. Jizang de huayan sixiang – yi Huayan youji wei zhongxin吉藏的华严思想 ——以《华严游意》为中心 [Jizang’s Huayan Thinking: Focusing on Pondering the Meaning of Huayan]. Wutaishan yanjiu 139: 50–55.
  29. Swanson, Paul L. 1989. Foundations of T’ian-T’ai Philosophy: The Flowering of the Two Truths Theory in Chinese Buddhism. Berkeley: Asian Humanities Press.
  30. Takamine, Ryōshū 高峯了州1976. Kegon ronshū 華厳論集 [A Collection of Essays on Huayan]. Tokyo: Kokusho kankokai.
  31. Tanaka, Kenneth K. 1990. The Dawn of Chinese Pure Land Buddhist Doctrine: Ching-ying Hui-yüan’s Commentary on the Visualisation Sutra. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  32. Wagner, Rudolf G. 2000. The Craft of a Chinese Commentator: Wang Bi on the Laozi. New York: State University of New York Press.
  33. Wei, Daoru 魏道儒 1998. Zhongguo huayanzong tongshi 中國華嚴宗通史 [A General History of the Huayan School]. Nanjing: Jiangsu guji chubanshe.
  34. Zachetti, Stefano 2003: “The Rediscovery of Three Early Buddhist Scriptures on Meditation: A Preliminary Analysis of the Fo shuo shi’er men jing, the Fo shuo jie shi’er men jing Translated by An Shigaoand. Their Commentary Preserved in the Newly Found Kongō-ji Manuscript.” Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 6: 251–299.
  35. Zachetti, Stefano 2008. “A ‘new’ early Chinese Buddhist commentary The nature of the Da anban shouyi jing大 安般守意經 T 602 reconsidered.’ Journal of International Association of Buddhist Studies 31.1–2: 421–484.
  36. Zachetti, Stefano 2010. “Some Remarks on The Authorship And Chronology of The Yin Chi Ru Jing Zhu 陰持入經註: The Second Phase in the Development of Early Chinese Buddhist Exegetical Literature.” In: Giacomella Orofino – Silvio Vita (eds.) Buddhist Asia 2: Papers from the Second Conference of Buddhist Studies Held in Naples in June 2004. Kyoto: Italian School of East Asian Studies, 141–198.
  37. Zhang Wenliang 张文良2017. Dongya fojiao shiye xia de huayan sixiang yanjiu 东亚佛教视野下的华严思想研究 [A Study on Huayan Thinking in the View of East Asian Buddhism]. Beijing: Guoji wenhua chuban gongsi.
  38. Zürcher, Eric 1959/2007. The Buddhist Conquest of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Early Medieval China. Leiden: E.J. Brill.