Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022)
Articles

The Exegetical Tradition of the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra

Imre Hamar
Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE)
Bio

Published 2022-11-22

Keywords

  • Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra,
  • Chinese Buddhism,
  • Huayan Buddhism,
  • Dilun school,
  • Vasubandhu,
  • Daśabhūmika-sūtra,
  • Fazang 法藏
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Hamar, I. (2022). The Exegetical Tradition of the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra. Journal of East Asian Cultures, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2022.1.1

Abstract

The Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra, which served as an ideological foundation for the establishment and gradual development of the Huayan school, is one of the most influential Mahāyāna sūtras in East Asian Buddhism. This article shows how the exegetical tradition that focused on the study of this scripture was started by the scholar monks of the Dilun school, who highly valued the Vasubandhu’s commentary on the Daśabhūmika-sūtra chapter of the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra, and was completed during the Tang dynasty by the masters of the Buddhist exegesis, who later were venerated as patriarchs of the Huayan school.

References

  1. Andrews, Susan – Chen Jinhua – Kuan Guang (eds.) 2020. The Transnational Cult of Mount Wutai. Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Series: Studies on East Asian Religions, Volume: 2. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004419872
  2. Birnbaum, Raoul 1983. Studies on the Mysteries of Mañjuśrī. Boulder: Society for the Study of Chinese Religion Monograph no. 2.
  3. Cao Shibang曹仕邦1989. Zhongguo fojiao yijing shi lunji中國佛教譯經史論集 [Collection of Essays on the History of the Translation of Scriptures in Chinese Buddhism]. Taibei: Dongchu chubanshe.
  4. Chang, Ae Soon 張愛順 2004. “Ryōben no ‘Kegon kyō ron’ ni tsuite: Kyujangaku no hisshabon 霊弁の『華厳経論』について : 奎章閣の筆写本 [Lingbian’s Commentary on the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra: The Gyujanggak Manuscript].” Indogaku bukkyōgaku kenkyū 53.1: 178–183.
  5. Chen, Jinhua 2002. Monks and Monarchs, Kinship and Kingship: Tanqian in Sui Buddhism and Politics. Kyoto: Scuola Italiana di Studi sull’ Asia Orientale.
  6. Chengyi 成一 (ed.) 2001–04. Xinxiu huayanjing shuchao 新修華嚴經疏鈔 [New Subcommnetary on the Commentary to the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra]. Taibei: Huayan lianshe.
  7. Fang Guangchang 方廣錩 (ed.) 2003. Zangwai fojiao wenxian 藏外佛教文獻 [Extracanonical Buddhist Documents]. Vol. 8. Beijing: Zongjiao wenhua chubanshe.
  8. Gimello, Robert M. 1976. “Chih-Yen (602–668) And the Foundations of Hua-yen Buddhism”. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
  9. Hamar, Imre 2002. A Religious Leader in the Tang: Chengguan’s Biography (Studia Philologica Buddhica Occasional Paper Series 12). Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies of The International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies.
  10. Henderson, John B. 1991. Scripture, Canon, and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400861989
  11. Ishii, Kōsei 石井公成 1996. Kegon shisō no kenkyū華厳思想の研究 [A Study on the Huayan Thinking]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.
  12. Kanno Hiroshi 2003. Chinese Buddhist Sūtra Commentaries of the Early Period. Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 6: 301–320.
  13. Kanno Hiroshi 2007. A General Survey of Research Concerning Chinese Commentaries on Lotus sūtra. Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 10: 417–444.
  14. Kanno Hiroshi – Felbur, Rafal 2015. “Sūtra Commentaries in Chinese until the Tang period.” In: Jonathan Silk (ed.) Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Volume 1: Literature and Languages. Leiden: Brill, 450–466.
  15. Keng Ching 2009. “Yogâcāra Buddhism Transmitted or Transformed? Paramârtha (499–569) and His Chinese Interpreters.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
  16. Kim, Young-ho 1990. Tao-sheng’s Commentary on the Lotus Sūtra: A Study and Translation (Bibliothe¬ca-Indo-Buddhica 101). New York: State University of New York Press.
  17. Kimura, Kiyotaka 木村清孝 1977. Shoki Chūgoku kegon shisō no kenkyū 初期中國華厳思想の研究 [A Study on the Early Huayan Thinking]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.
  18. Liu, Ming-Wood 1994. Madhyamaka Thought in China. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004450332
  19. Nattier, Jan 2008. A Guide to the Earliest Chinese Buddhist Translations: Texts from the Eastern Han and Three Kingdoms Periods. Bibliotheca Philologica et Philosophica Buddhica, Vol. X. Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University.
  20. Ōchō, Enichi横超慧日1979. “Shakkyō shikō釈経史考. [An Examination of the History of Translating Scriptures]” In: Chūgoku bukkyō no kenkyū 中国仏教の研究 [A Study on Chinese Buddhism], vol. 3. Kyoto: Hōzokan (first published in Shina bukkyō shigaku (1937) 1: 75–110).
  21. Paul, Diana Y. 1984. Philosophy of Mind in Sixth-Century China: Paramārtha’s ‘Evolution of Consciousness’. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  22. Satō, Taishun 佐藤泰舜 1951. “Reiben no Kengon kyō ron ni tsuite 霊弁の華厳経論に就いて [Lingbian’s Commentary on the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra]” In: Miyamoto, Shōson 宮本正尊 et al. (eds.) Indo tetsugaku to bukkyō no sho mondai: Ui Hakuju hakushi kanreki kinen ronbunshū 印度哲学と仏教の諸問題:宇井伯寿博士還暦記念論文集 [Questions regarding Indian Philosophy and Buddhism: A Collection of Essays in the Memory of Dr. Ui Hakuju]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 249–279.
  23. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961a. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介. [An Introduction to the new Discovery of Lingbian’s Commentary on the Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra]” Nanto bukkyō 9: 105–126.
  24. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961b. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 2 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (二).” Nanto bukkyō 10: 107–125.
  25. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961c. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 3 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (三).” Nanto bukkyō 11: 121–143.
  26. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961d. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 4 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (四).” Nanto bukkyō 12: 112–132.
  27. Shindō, Shinkai 新藤晋海 1961e. “Ryōben jutsu Kegon kyō ron shin hakkenbun no shōkai 5 霊弁述華厳経論新発見分の紹介 (五).” Nanto bukkyō 13: 116–141.
  28. Sun Shaofei孙少飞2019. Jizang de huayan sixiang – yi Huayan youji wei zhongxin吉藏的华严思想 ——以《华严游意》为中心 [Jizang’s Huayan Thinking: Focusing on Pondering the Meaning of Huayan]. Wutaishan yanjiu 139: 50–55.
  29. Swanson, Paul L. 1989. Foundations of T’ian-T’ai Philosophy: The Flowering of the Two Truths Theory in Chinese Buddhism. Berkeley: Asian Humanities Press.
  30. Takamine, Ryōshū 高峯了州1976. Kegon ronshū 華厳論集 [A Collection of Essays on Huayan]. Tokyo: Kokusho kankokai.
  31. Tanaka, Kenneth K. 1990. The Dawn of Chinese Pure Land Buddhist Doctrine: Ching-ying Hui-yüan’s Commentary on the Visualisation Sutra. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  32. Wagner, Rudolf G. 2000. The Craft of a Chinese Commentator: Wang Bi on the Laozi. New York: State University of New York Press.
  33. Wei, Daoru 魏道儒 1998. Zhongguo huayanzong tongshi 中國華嚴宗通史 [A General History of the Huayan School]. Nanjing: Jiangsu guji chubanshe.
  34. Zachetti, Stefano 2003: “The Rediscovery of Three Early Buddhist Scriptures on Meditation: A Preliminary Analysis of the Fo shuo shi’er men jing, the Fo shuo jie shi’er men jing Translated by An Shigaoand. Their Commentary Preserved in the Newly Found Kongō-ji Manuscript.” Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 6: 251–299.
  35. Zachetti, Stefano 2008. “A ‘new’ early Chinese Buddhist commentary The nature of the Da anban shouyi jing大 安般守意經 T 602 reconsidered.’ Journal of International Association of Buddhist Studies 31.1–2: 421–484.
  36. Zachetti, Stefano 2010. “Some Remarks on The Authorship And Chronology of The Yin Chi Ru Jing Zhu 陰持入經註: The Second Phase in the Development of Early Chinese Buddhist Exegetical Literature.” In: Giacomella Orofino – Silvio Vita (eds.) Buddhist Asia 2: Papers from the Second Conference of Buddhist Studies Held in Naples in June 2004. Kyoto: Italian School of East Asian Studies, 141–198.
  37. Zhang Wenliang 张文良2017. Dongya fojiao shiye xia de huayan sixiang yanjiu 东亚佛教视野下的华严思想研究 [A Study on Huayan Thinking in the View of East Asian Buddhism]. Beijing: Guoji wenhua chuban gongsi.
  38. Zürcher, Eric 1959/2007. The Buddhist Conquest of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Early Medieval China. Leiden: E.J. Brill.