The Buddhist Interpretation of the Confucianist Concept of Family: Filial Piety as Universal Compassion
Megjelent 2021-12-15
Kulcsszavak
- konfucianizmus,
- buddhizmus,
- szülőtisztelet,
- etika
Hogyan kell idézni
Copyright (c) 2021 a szerző(k)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
A szülőtisztelet az egyik fő morális érték a konfuciánus tanításban, amely a kínai társadalmi értékrendszer alappillérévé vált, amennyiben leírja és előírja az emberi közösségek megfelelő működését mikro- (családi) és makro- (állami) szinten. A buddhizmus megjelenése, amely tanítás azt hirdeti, hogy a legfőbb igazságot csak azok érhetik el könnyűszerrel, akik cölibátusba vonulva szerzetesi életpályára lépnek, kihívás elé állította a konfucianizmus általánosan elfogadott morális kötelmeit, és párbeszédet, esetenként vitát indított a kínai írástudókkal a buddhista és a konfuciánus etika különbségeiről és hasonlóságairól. A jelen tanulmány abba nyújt bepillantást, hogyan igyekeztek bizonyítani a buddhizmus kínai értelmezői nemcsak azt, hogy a szülőtisztelet a buddhizmus minden gyakorlója számára követelményt jelent, mintegy bebocsátásként abba a társadalmi közegbe, amelyben a szülőtisztelet az erényes emberi létezést reprezentálja, hanem a szülőtiszteletről szóló indiai szövegek hamisítása, valamint indiai iratok képi megjelenítése és kommentálása révén azt is , hogy a szülőtisztelet a buddhista gyakorlat meghatározó eleme.
Hivatkozások
- Arai Keiyo (trans.) 2005. The Sutra on the Profundity of Filial Love. In: Apocryphal Scriptures, BDK English Tripiṭaka Series Moraga: BDK America, Inc., 117–132.
- Bandō Shōjun (trans.) 2005. The Ullambana Sutra. In: Apocryphal Scriptures, BDK English Tripiṭaka Series. Moraga: BDK America, Inc., 17–26.
- Buswell, Robert Jr. (ed.) 1990. Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
- Chen, Jinhua 2007. Philosopher, practitioner, politician: The many lives of Fazang (643–712). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004156135.i-542
- Ch’en, Kenneth 1968. “Filial Piety in Chinese Buddhism.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 28: 81–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2718595
- Cleary, Thomas 1993. The Flower Ornament Scripture. A Translation of the Avatamsaka Sutra. Boston: Shambhala.
- Cole, Alan 1998. Mothers and Sons in Chinese Buddhism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Galambos Imre. The changing face of filial piety: The Śyāma jātaka. forthcoming.
- Gombrich, Richard F. 2006. Theravāda Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203016039
- Greene, Eric Matthew 2012. “Meditation, Repentance and Visionary Experience in Early Medieval Chinese Buddhism.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.
- Gregory, Peter 1991. Tsung-mi and the Sinification of Buddhism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Gregory, Peter 1995. Inquiry Into the Origin of Humanity – An Annotated Translation of Tsung-mi’s Yüan jen lun with a Modern Commentary. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
- Guang Xing. “Filial Piety in Chinese Buddhism.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.559
- Guang Xing. 2010. “A Buddhist-Confucian Controversy on Filial Piety.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37.2: 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2010.01582.x
- Guang, Xing 2016. “The Teaching and Practice of Filial Piety in Buddhism.” Journal of Law and Religion 31.2: 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2016.20
- Guang, Xing 2005. “Filial Piety in Early Buddhism.” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 12: 82–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvn6qz.25
- Guang Xing 2011. “Yulanpen Festival and Chinese Ancestor Worship.” Journal of Centre for Buddhist Studies Sri Lanka 9: 123–143.
- Guang, Xing 2008. “A Study of the Apocryphal Sūtra: Fumu Enzhong Jing.” International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture 11: 105–146.
- Hamar Imre 2002. A Religious Leader in the Tang: Chengguan’s Biography. Studia Philologica Buddhica Occasional Paper Series XII., Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies of The International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies.
- Hamar Imre 1999. “Buddhism and the Dao in Tang China: The Impact of Confucianism and Daoism on the Philosophy of Chengguan.” Acta Orientalia Hung. 52.3–4: 283–292.
- Inagaki Hisao 2003. “The Contemplation Sutra (Sutra on the Visualization of the Buddha of Infinite Life Delivered by Śākyamuni Buddha).” In: The Three Pure Land Sutras. Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, 63–88.
- Kanno Hiroshi, Felbur Rafael 2015. “Sūtra Commentaries in Chinese until the Tang Period.” In: Jonathan A. Silk (ed.) Brill's Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Volume One. Leiden: Brill, 450–466.
- Karashima, Seishi 2013. “The Meaning of Yulanpen 盂蘭盆 -- “rice bowl” on Pravāraṇā Day.” Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 16: 289–305.
- Kato Bunno (trans) 1975. The Threefold Lotus Sutra. Tokyo: Kosei Publishing Company.
- Liu, Ming-wood 1979. “The Teaching of Fa-tsang: An Examination of Buddhist Metaphysics” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
- Ma, Shichang 2001. Essays on the Buddhist Cave Temples of China. Taiwan: Chueh Feng Buddhist Art and Culture Foundation 覺風佛教藝術文化基金會.
- Mai Cuong T. 2009. “Visualization Apocrypha and The Making of Buddhist Deity Cults in Early Medieval China: with Special Reference to the Cults of Amitābha, Maitreya, And Samantabhadra.” Ph.D. diss., Indiana University.
- Muller, Charles and Tanaka, Kenneth (trans.) 2017. The Brahmā’s Net Sutra. BDK English Tripiṭaka Series Moraga: BDK America, Inc.
- Nattier, Jan 2005. “The Proto-History of the Buddhāvataṃsaka: The Pusa benye jing 菩薩本業經 and the Dousha jing 兜沙經.” Annual Report of The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic Year 2004 [ARIRIAB] 8, 323–360.
- Ogawa, Kanichi 小川 貫弌 1984. “Fumu Enzhong Jing.” Tonko to chugoku bukkyo 敦煌と中国仏教, Koza Tonko 講座敦煌 7. Tokyo: Daito Shuppansha, 207–222.
- Quinter, David 2010. “Visualizing the Mañjuśrī Parinirvāṇa Sutra as a Contemplation Sutra.” Asia Major (3rd Series) 23.2: 97–128.
- Sheng Kai 圣凯 2004. “Lun ru fo dao sanjiao lunli de jiaoshe – yi wujie yu wuchang wei zhongxin 论儒佛道三教伦理的交涉— 以五戒与五常为中心.” Foxue yanjiu 佛学研究, 218–227.
- Schopen, Gregory 1984. “Filial Piety and the Monk in the Practice of Indian Buddhism: A Question of ‘Sinicization’ Viewed from the Other Side.” T'oung Pao, Second Series, 70.1/3: 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853284X00044
- Schopen, Gregory 2007. “The Buddhist Bhikṣu’s Obligation to Support His Parents in Two Vinaya Traditions.” Journal of the Pali Text Society 29, 107–136.
- Schopen, Gregory 1997. Bones, Stones, and Buddhist Monks: Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India. University of Hawai'i Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824851224
- Strong, John 1983. “Filial Piety and Buddhism: The Indian Antecedents to a ‘Chinese’ Problem.” In Traditions in Contact and Change. Edited by Peter Slater and Donald Wiebe, Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 171–186.
- Teiser, Stephen 1988. The Ghost Festival in Medieval China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Yamabe Nobuyoshi. “The Sutra on the Ocean-Like Samadhi of the Visualization of the Buddha: The Interfusion of the Chinese and Indian Cultures in Central Asia as Reflected in a Fifth Century Apocryphal Sutra.” Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1999.
- Zürcher, Eric 2007. The Buddhist Conquest of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Early Medieval China. Third Edition with a Foreword by Stephen F. Teiser. Leiden: Brill.