Távol-keleti Tanulmányok

Évf. 13 szám 1 (2021): Közösségépítés: család és nemzet, hagyomány és innováció
Tanulmányok

Celibacy or Marriage? Dilemmas for Buddhist Monks in Korea: Manhae Han Yongun 萬海 韓龍雲 (1879–1944) and His Ideas for Promoting Clerical Marriage

PDF (English)
  • Beatrix Mecsi
Beatrix Mecsi
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2021.1.3

Megjelent 2021-12-15

Kulcsszavak

  • Korea,
  • papi házasság,
  • buddhizmus,
  • japán gyarmati uralom hatása

Hogyan kell idézni

Mecsi, B. (2021). Celibacy or Marriage? Dilemmas for Buddhist Monks in Korea: Manhae Han Yongun 萬海 韓龍雲 (1879–1944) and His Ideas for Promoting Clerical Marriage. Távol-Keleti Tanulmányok, 13(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2021.1.3

Copyright (c) 2021 a szerző(k)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Absztrakt

A Chosŏn-kor buddhistákat háttérbe szorító és korlátozó konfuciánus időszakát követően a japán gyarmati uralom kezdetén a japán gyakorlatra jellemző szerzetesi házasság lehetősége valóságos alternatívaként jelent meg a koreai buddhisták számára a huszadik század elején. Míg a szakirodalomban gyakran a japán gyarmati örökség elnyomó emlékét látják ma is a papi házasságban, addig a korabeli dokumentumok elemzésével sokkal összetettebb kép rajzolódik elénk. A koreai értelmiségiek közül leglátványosabban a korszak egyik jelentős személyisége, Manhae Han Young’un (1879−1944) koreai buddhizmus megreformálását sürgető szisztematikus írása, a Chosŏn Pulgyo yusinnon 朝鮮佛敎維新論 (Értekezés a koreai buddhizmus helyreállításáról) című mű a cölibátus gyakorlatával szembeni polémia és a papi házasság gyakorlatának engedélyeztetése érdekében megfogalmazott tizenharmadik pontjának bemutatásával és körülményeivel kapcsolatban láthatjuk, hogy érvelésében konfuciánus tanultsága, személyisége és élete ugyanúgy szerepet játszik mint a korszak haladónak vélt ideológiái, a szociáldrawinizmus és a modernizmus, a demokrácia gondolatai. De a szerzetesek mindennapi életét és körülményeit feltáró elsődleges dokumentumokból az is kiderül, hogy a házasulási hajlandóságot a japán gyarmati rendszerben bevezetett új örökösödési szabályok is nagy mértékben befolyásolták.

PDF (English)

Hivatkozások

  1. Han, Yongun 1913. Chosŏn Bulgyo Yusinnon 朝鮮佛敎維新論. Seoul: Buddhist Library佛敎書舘.
  2. Han Yong-un chŏnjip 韓龍雲全集 [Han Yong-un összegyűjtött műve] 1913 (1980). Vol. 2. Seoul: Shin Gu Publishing Co.
  3. An Pyong-jik 1979. “Han Yong-un’s Liberalism: An Analysis of the ‘Reformation of Korean Buddhism’,” Korea Journal 19.12: 13–18.
  4. Asanga Tilakaratne 2007. “The Early Vinaya Stand on Monastic Sexual Behaviour: A Study of the First Paaraajika of the Theravada Vinaya.” In: Celibacy and Enlightenment / Salvation. Korea University, 85–96.
  5. Baker, Don 2014. “Privatization of Buddhism in the Choson Dynasty.” Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies 14.2: 153–169. https://doi.org/10.21866/esjeas.2014.14.2.001
  6. Birtalan Ágnes 2013. “A buddhizmus mint államvallás története és stratégiái Koreában: Hoguk Pulgyo (護國佛教)” [History and Strategies of Buddhism as a State Religion in Korea: Hoguk Pulgyo (護國佛教)]. In: Szilágyi Zsolt – Hidas Gergely (eds.) Buddhizmus [Buddhism]. Budapest: Magyar Vallástudományi Társaság – L’Harmattan, 189–208.
  7. Bodiford, William M. 2005. “Introduction.” In: William M. Bodiford (ed.) Going Forth: Visions of Buddhist Vinaya: Essays Presented in Honor of Professor Stanley Weinstein. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824851774
  8. Breen, John 1996. “The Imperial Oath of April 1868: Ritual, Power and Politics in Restoration Japan.” Monumenta Nipponica 51.4: 407–429. https://doi.org/10.2307/2385417
  9. Browning, Don – Green, M. Christian – Witte, John Jr. (eds.) 2009. Sex, Marriage, and Family in World Religions. New York: Columbia University Press.
  10. Buswell Jr., Robert E. 1992. The Zen Monastic Experience. Buddhist Practice in Contemporary Korea. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691216102
  11. Buswell Jr., Robert E. 1998. “Imagining ‘Korean Buddhism’: The Invention of a National Religious Tradition.” In: Pai Hyung Il – Timothy R. Tangherlini (eds.) Nationalism and the Construction of Korean Identity. (Research Monograph 26.) Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 73–107.
  12. Buswell Jr., Robert E. 1999. “Buddhism under Confucian Domination: The Synthetic Vision of Sŏsan Hyujŏng.” In: Jahyun Kim Haboush – Martina Deuchler (eds.) Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea. (Harvard East Asian Monographs.) Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Asia Center, 134–159. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781684173310_006
  13. Buswell Jr., Robert E. 2004. Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Macmillan Reference.
  14. Buswell Jr., Robert E. 2007. “Is Celibacy Anachronistic? Korean Debates over the Secularization of Buddhism During the Japanese Occupation Period.” In: Celibacy and Enlightenment / Salvation. (International Conference on Celibacy and Enlightenment / Salvation on August 2–3, 2007.) International Center for Korean Studies, Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University, 29–47.
  15. Buswell Jr., Robert E. – David S. Lopez Jr (eds.) 2017. The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780190681159.001.0001
  16. Cabezón, José Ignacio 2017. Sexuality in Classical South Asian Buddhism. (Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism.) Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
  17. Ch’en, Kenneth 1964. Buddhism in China. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
  18. Cho, Sungtaek 2002. “Buddhism and Society: On Buddhist Engagement with Society.” Korea Journal 42.4: 119–136.
  19. Cho, Sungtaek 2010. “Formation of Modern Buddhist Scholarship.” In: Jin Y. Park (ed.) Makers of Modern Korean Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 315–330.
  20. Cole, Alan 2004. “Buddhism and the Family”. In: Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Macmillan Reference. Robert Jr. Buswell (ed.), 280–281.
  21. Covell, Alan Carter 1986. Folk Art and Magic: Shamanism in Korea. Seoul: Hollym Corporation.
  22. Covell, Jon Carter 1982. Korea’s Cultural Roots. Seoul: Hollym Corporation.
  23. Chŏng Pyŏng-jo 1991. “Han Yong-un.” Han’guk minjok munhwa tae paekkwa sajŏn [Korean National Culture Encyclopedia]. Sŏngnam: The Academy of Korean Studies.
  24. Clarke, Shayne 2014. Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticism. University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824840075
  25. Clarke, Shayne, 2015. “Vinayas.” Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Jonathan A. Silk (ed.). Leiden: Brill, vol. 1, 60–87.
  26. Faure, Bernard 1998. The Red Thread. Buddhist Approaches to Sexuality. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822607
  27. Glassman, Hank 2003. “Buddhist Sexuality.” In: Buswell et.al. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Buddhism. New York: Macmillan Reference.
  28. Goulde, John Isaac 1985. Anti-Buddhist polemic in fourteenth and fifteenth century Korea: the emergence of Confucian exclusivism. (Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.)
  29. Guang, Xing 2016. “The Teaching and Practice of Filial Piety in Buddhism.” Journal of Law and Religion 31.2: 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2016.20
  30. Han, Yongun 1913 (2016). “Treatise on the Restoration of Korean Buddhism (Joseon Bulgyo Yusinnon).” In Gwon Sangro – Yi Yeongjae – Han Yongun. Tracts on the Modern Reformation of Korean Buddhism. (Collected Works of Modern Korean Buddhism.) Translated by Pori Pak. Seoul: Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism, 96–204.
  31. Huh Woosung 2000. “Manhae’s Understanding of Buddhism.” Korea Journal 40.2: 65–101.
  32. Huh Woosung 2005. “A Monk of Mukti and Karma: The Life and Thought of Baek Yongseong.” Korea Journal 45.1: 29–63.
  33. Jaffe, Richard M. 2001. Neither Monk nor Layman: Clerical Marriage in Modern Japanese Buddhism. FE. Princeton: Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691231099
  34. Kang, Wi Jo 1987. Religion and Politics in Korea under the Japanese Rule. (Studies in Asian Thought and Religion, Vol. 5.) Lewiston, NY; Queenstone: Edwin Mellen Press, 45–105.
  35. Ketelaar, James Edward 1990. Of Heretics and Martyrs in Meiji Japan: Buddhism and Its Persecution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  36. Keown, Damien 2008. A Dictionary of Buddhism. Oxford University Press.
  37. Keyworth, George A. 2004. “Confucianism and Buddhism”. Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Macmillan Reference. Robert E. Buswell Jr. (ed.), 170.
  38. Kim, Gwang-sik 2007. “Hanyongunŭi pulgyo kŭndaehwa kihoekkwa sŭngnyŏgyŏrhon chayuron [Han Yong-un’s Plan for Buddhist Modernization and Clerical Marriage].” Taegaksasang 11: 400–438.
  39. Kim, Jongmyeong 2009. “Yi Nŭnghwa, Buddhism, and the Modernization of Korea: A Critical Review.” In Jin Y. Park (ed.) Makers of Modern Korean Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 91–108.
  40. Kim, Hwansoo 2014. “Social Stigmas of Buddhist Monastics and the Lack of Lay Buddhist Leadership in Colonial Korea (1910–1945)”. Korea Journal 54.1: 105–132. https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2014.54.1.105
  41. Lancaster, Lewis 1984. “Buddhism and Family in East Asia.” Religion and Family in East Asia. (Senri Ethnological Studies 11.) Gerog A. DeVos – Takao Sofue (eds.). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 139–151.
  42. Lancaster, Lewis 2007. “Bodhisattvas and Celibacy: Buddhism among Kings and Merchants.” In: Celibacy and Enlightenment / Salvation. (International Conference on Celibacy and Enlightenment / Salvation on August 2–3, 2007.) International Center for Korean Studies, Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University, 11–17.
  43. Lee, Peter (ed.) 1980. The Silence of Love. Twentieth Century Korean Poetry. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  44. Mok Chong-bae 1979. “Han Yong-un and Buddhism.” Korea Journal 10.12: 19–27.
  45. Mohan Pankaj 2014. “Re-visiting Han Yong-un’s Buddhist Texts and their Nationalist Contexts.” Sŏngnam: Academy of Korean Studies http://congress.aks.ac.kr/korean/files/2_1357533976.pdf (accessed: 3.03.2020).
  46. Morinaga, Sōkō 1993. “Celibacy: the view of a Zen monk from Japan.” Vatican. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cclergy/documents/rc_con_cclergy_doc_01011993_zen_en.html (accessed: 3.03.2020).
  47. Ṅāṇamoli-Bodhi (transl.) 2009. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha. A Translation of the Majjhima-Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
  48. Osváth Gábor 2006. Koreai Nyelv és irodalom [Korean language and literature]. Budapest: Editio Plurilingua.
  49. Park, Jeongeun 2016. Clerical Marriage and Buddhist Modernity in Early Twentieth-century Korea. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
  50. Park Jeongeun 2020. “A Monk’s Double Identity and the Issue of Clerical Marriage: An Examination of Kim Chŏnghae’s Household Registers in Colonial Korea.” Journal of Korean Religions 11.1: 155–187. https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2020.0005
  51. Park, Chong-hong 1964. “Buddhist Influence on Korean Thought”. Korea Journal 4.5: 4–7.
  52. Pak Kyŏnghun 1981. “Buddhism in Modern Korea,” Korea Journal 21.8: 32–40.
  53. Park, Jin Y. 2010. “Introduction: Buddhism and Modernity in Korea.” In: Jin Y. Park (ed.) Makers of Modern Korean Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1–15.
  54. Park, Jin Y. 2019. “Kyŏnghŏ Sŏngu and the Existential Dimensions of Modern Korean Buddhism”. Journal of Korean Religions 10.2: 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2019.0005
  55. Park, Pori 2005. “Korean Buddhist Reforms and Problems in the Adoption of Modernity during the Colonial Period.” Korea Journal 45.1: 87–113.
  56. Park, Pori 2007 “A Korean Buddhist Response to Modernity: The Doctrinal Underpinning of Han Yongun’s (1879–1944) Reformist Thought.” Seoul Journal of Korean Studies 20.1: 21–44.
  57. Park, Pori 2010. “A Korean Buddhist Response to Modernity: Manhae Han Yongun’s Doctrinal Reinterpretation of His Reformist Thought”. In: Park, Jin Y. (ed.) Makers of Modern Korean Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 41–60.
  58. Ro, Young-chan 2007. “The Absence of Celibacy in Confucianism and East Asian Worldview.” In: Celibacy and Enlightenment / Salvation. [International Conference on Celibacy and Enlightenment / Salvation on August 2–3, 2007.] International Center for Korean Studies, Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University, 123–132.
  59. Ruzsa, Ferenc 2018. “Why was original Buddhism for monks only?” Keynote Address at International Symposium “Buddhism in Practice” on 17–18th September 2018, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
  60. Sørensen, Henrik H. 1990. “Korean Buddhist Journals during Early Japanese Colonial Rule.” Korea Journal 30.1: 17–27.
  61. Sørensen, Henrik H. 2010. “Mirror of Emptiness: The Life and Times of the Sŏn Master Kyŏnghŏ Sŏngu.” In: Jin Y. Park (ed.) Makers of Modern Korean Buddhism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 131–155.
  62. Sørensen, Henrik H. 1999. “Buddhism and Secular Power in Twentieth Century Korea.” In (Ian Harris (ed.) Buddhism and Politics in Twentieth Century Asia. London and New York: Pinter, 127–152.
  63. Tikhonov, Vladimir 2003. “Did They Sell the Sect and Change the Patriarchs? Korean Buddhist Pro-Japanese Collaboration (1877–1905) and Its Modern Critics”. Papers of the British Association for Korean Studies 8: 85–105.
  64. Tikhonov, Vladimir 2004. “The Japanese Missionaries and Their Impact on Korean Buddhist Developments (1876–1910).” International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture 4: 7–49.
  65. Tikhonov, Vladimir 2010. “The Japanese Missionaries and their Impact on Korean Buddhist Developments (1876–1910)”. Jin Y. Park (ed.) Makers of Modern Korean Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 245–274.
  66. Tikhonov, Vladimir – Owen Miller (eds.) 2007. Selected Writings of Han Yongun: From Social Darwinism to Socialism with a Buddhist Face. Global Oriental. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9781905246472.i-264
  67. Tikhonov, Vladimir 2012. “Violent Buddhism. Korean Buddhism and Its Colonial Bargain”. In: Vladimir Tikhonov and Torkel Brekke (eds.) Buddhism and Violence: Militarism and Buddhism in Modern Asia. New York: Routledge, 227–246. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203111024
  68. Tōru, Takahashi 1929. Richō Bukkyō. Tōkyō: Hobunkan; Ōsaka: Ōsaka Hobunkan.
  69. Yao (Xinzhong) – Hsin-chung Yao – Xinzhong Yao 2000. An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800887
  70. Yoshikawa, Buntaro 1920. Chosen no shukyo [Religion in Korea]. Tokyo: Keijo.
  71. Yun, Woncheol – Park, Beom Seok 2019. “Responses of Korean Buddhism to the Ethos of Contemporary Korea: Three Discourses in the Wake of Modernization.” Religions 10.1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10010006
  72. Walraven, Boudewijn 2012. “Buddhist Accommodation and Appropriation and the Limits of Confucianization.” Journal of Korean Religions 3.1: 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2012.0005