Published 2024-01-04
Keywords
- Yayoi-period,
- Kofun-period,
- female shamans,
- Himiko,
- Iyo
- Queen Mother of the West,
- hime-hiko sei,
- matriarchal society,
- patriarchal society,
- sacral authority ...More
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study discusses the connections between women, governance, and sacred power – specifically in this case shamanism – in the context of late Yayoi and Kofun-period Japanese society, focusing on the queens of the Wa country, Himiko and Iyo, and their place – or absence thereof – among traditional Japanese rulers. While the topic is less known in Hungary, it is a frequently researched subject in Japan and in other foreign countries. In my research, I mainly relied on secondary sources, collecting relevant studies related to my topic and drawing my own conclusions by comparing them. Although the topic has been extensively researched abroad, most of the studies I examined were not in direct contact with each other, which is why I believe that this study can offer a new perspective.
Himiko and Iyo do not appear in the Japanese chronicles Kojiki and Nihonshoki, although the Chinese chronicle Gishi gives a detailed account of Himiko’s reign, possibly because the two queens could not be incorporated into the patrilineal succession system of the later imperial dynasty. At that time, there might not have been a rule regarding inheritance or there could have been some form of female-centric inheritance. From archaeological findings starting from the middle of the Kofun-period, it can be inferred that a transition toward a more patriarchal society had already begun. This was likely a gradual process rather than the result of a religious revolution (Ellwood, 1990). It is conceivable that during Himiko’s time, the cult of the Queen Mother of the West, proposed by Barnes (2014) as an avatar of Himiko, was widespread in Japan. This study argues that since this was already a late Han-period version of the myth (which includes the counterpart of the Queen Mother, the King Father of the East), it was actually a step towards patriarchalisation, laying the foundation for the later tradition of dual female–male rule known as hime-hiko sei. However, the greatest impact on this process was exerted by militarisation, which had already begun before Himiko’s reign. Nevertheless, we can state that during this era, the roles of the sacred and political leaders were not dependent on gender.
References
- Woren chuan [Wajinden]. https://ctext.org/text.pl?node=603372&if=en (utolsó letöltés: 2023.08.30.).
- Arakawa Rie 荒川理恵 2001: „Amaterasu to Seiōbo アマテラスと西王母 [Amaterasu és a Nyugati Királyi Anya].” Gakushūin Daigaku Jōdai Bungaku Kenkyū 学習院大学上代文 学研究 26: 1–14.
- Aston, William G. 1896. Nihongi. Chronicles of Japan from the Earliest Times to A.D. 697. Lon- don: The Japan Society.
- Barnes, Gina L. 2007. State Formation in Japan: Emergence of a 4th-century ruling elite. Lon- don: Routeledge.
- Barnes, Gina L. 2014. „A Hypothesis for Early Kofun Rulership.” Japan Review 27: 3–29. https:// doi.org/10.15055/00005990
- Brown, Delmer M. 1993. „The Yamato Kingdom.” In: Delmer M. Brown (ed.) The Cambridge History of Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 108–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521223522.005
- Como, Michael 2009. Weaving and binding: immigrant gods and female immortals. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824829575.001.0001
- Edwards, Walter 1983. „Event and Process in the Founding of Japan: The Horserider Theory in Archeological Perspective.” The Journal of Japanese Studies 9.2: 265–295. https://doi. org/10.2307/132294
- Edwards, Walter 1996. „In pursuit of Himiko.” Monumenta Nipponica 51.1: 53–79. https://doi. org/10.2307/2385316
- Ellwood, Robert S. 1990. „The Sujin Religious Revolution.” Japanese Journal of Religious Stud- ies 17.2–3: 199–217. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.17.2-3.1990.199-217
- Hane, Mikiso 1991. Premodern Japan: A Historical Survey. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Hori Ichiro 1975. „Shamanism in Japan.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 2.4: 231–287. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.2.4.1975.231-288
- Kazár Lajos 1982. Kodzsiki. Régi történetek feljegyzései. Sydney: Magyar Történelmi Társulat. Kidder Jr., J. Edward 2007. Himiko and Japan’s elusive chiefdom of Yamatai: archaeology, histo-
- ry and mythology. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
- Kidder Jr., J. Edward 1993. „The earliest societies in Japan.” In: Delmer M. Brown (ed.) The Cambridge History of Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 48–107. https://doi. org/10.1017/CHOL9780521223522
- Kirkland, Russel 1997. „The Sun and the Throne. The Origins of the Royal Descent Myth in An- cient Japan.” Numen 44.2: 109–152. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568527972629786
- Kishimoto Naofumi 2013. „Dual Kingship in the Kofun Period as Seen from the Keyhole Tombs.”
- Journal of the Urban-Culture Research Center 4: 1–21.
- Kitagawa, Joseph M. 1990. „Some Reflections on Japanese Religion and Its Relationship to the Imperial System.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 17.2–3: 129–178. https://doi. org/10.18874/jjrs.17.2-3.1990.129-178
- Lázár Marianna 2022. 魏志倭人傳. „A Vej-dinasztia története – Feljegyzések a va népről.” Or-
- pheus Noster 2.14: 7–24.
- Maeda Haruto 前田晴人 2015. „Joō Himiko no saikonseibi to Mimoroyama no Denshō. 女王卑 弥呼の聖婚祭儀と御諸山の伝承 [Himiko királynő szent esküvői szertartása és az Omo- ro-hegy hagyományai].” Chīki Sōgō Kenkyūjo Kiyō 地域総合研究所紀要 7: 3–26.
- Miller, Laura 2014. „Rebranding Himiko, the Shaman Queen of Ancient History.” Mechademia 9 (Origins): 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1353/mec.2014.0015
- Naoki Kōjirō 1993. „The Nara state.” In: Delmer M. Brown (ed.) The Cambridge Histo- ry of Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 221–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CHOL9780521223522
- Nitō Atsushi 仁藤淳史2009. Himiko to Toyo Wakoku no joōtachi 卑弥呼と台与、倭国の女王
- たち [Wa ország királynői: Himiko és Iyo]. Tōkyō: Yamakawa Shuppansha.
- Okazaki Takashi 1993. „Japan and the continent.” In: Delmer M. Brown (ed.) The Cambridge History of Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 268–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521223522.008
- Piggott, Joan R. 2003. „The Last Classical Female Sovereign: Kōken-Shōtoku Tennō.” In Dorothy Ko – Jahyun Kim Haboush – Joan R. Piggott (eds.) Women and Confucian Cultures in Premodern China, Korea, and Japan. University of California Press, 47–75. https://doi. org/10.1525/9780520927827-006
- Sakamoto Taro 1991. The six national histories of Japan. Ford. John S. Brownlee. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Seike Akira 清家章 1998. „Josei shucchō to gunjiken. 女性首長と軍事権 [Női nemzetségfők
- és a katonai hatalom].” Machikaneyama ronsō. Rekishihen 待兼山論叢. 史学篇 32: 25–47. Torao Toshiya 1993. „Nara economic and social institutions.” In: Delmer M. Brown (ed.) The
- Cambridge History of Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 415–452. https://doi. org/10.1017/CHOL9780521223522
- Totman, Conrad 2006. Japán története. Budapest: Osiris.
- Tsurumi, E. Patricia 1981. Japan’s Early Female Emperors. Historical Reflections 8.1: 41–49. Yamaji Masanori 1989. Japán történelem és hagyományok. Budapest: Gondolat.
- Yoshie Akiko – Shapiro, Michael – Kinoshita Tomoko 2014. „When Antiquity Meets the Modern: Presenting the Female Rulers in the Making of Japanese History.” Teikyō Journal of History 29: 400–365.
- Yoshie Akiko – Tonomura Hitomi – Takata Azumi Ann 2013. „Gendered Interpretations of Fe- male Rule: The Case of Himiko, Ruler of Yamatai.” U.S.–Japan Women’s Journal 44: 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwj.2013.0009