Vol. 15 No. 2 (2023): Buddhism in Practice
Articles

Practice and Understanding in Modern Chinese Pure Land Buddhism

Jakub Zamorski
Jagellonian University
Bio

Published 2023-09-30

Keywords

  • Yinguang,
  • Tang Dayuan,
  • Consciousness-only studies,
  • Chinese Pure Land Buddhism,
  • Ouyang Jingwu,
  • Buddha-Nature thought,
  • genbenzhi,
  • houdezhi
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Zamorski, J. (2023). Practice and Understanding in Modern Chinese Pure Land Buddhism. Journal of East Asian Cultures, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2023.2.10

Abstract

The present paper aims to contribute to the ongoing scholarly discussion about the impact of Western concepts on the modern East Asian understanding of Buddhism. Previous studies on the intellectual and cultural history of Chinese Buddhism in China’s Republican (1911–1949) period suggest that the newly imported distinctions between religion and philosophy, and reason and faith, were instrumental in creating a new secular discourse that favoured the doctrinally orientated Buddhist traditions (notably Consciousness-only/Yogācāra) and belittled the more practical and devotional Buddhist currents (especially Pure Land Buddhism). While those observations pertain to the views of secular elites, a much more complex picture emerges from the confessional literature of the Republican period, for example Buddhist journals. As the present paper demonstrates, while some followers of the movement of ‘Consciousness-only studies’ were indeed critical of Pure Land devotionalism, they did not necessarily problematise it by appealing to the newly introduced Western conceptual framework.
The first part of the present paper reexamines the devotional model of Pure Land practice associated with the influential Republican-era monk Yinguang. It argues that Yinguang’s lukewarm attitude towards intellectual approach to Buddhism was itself based in his particular interpretation of traditional Buddhist thought – especially the scholastic distinction between ‘principle’ and ‘phenomena’, and the Sinitic Buddha-Nature thought, which prioritises practical and non-conceptual wisdom over discursive knowledge. In the second part the paper turns to the critique of popular Pure Land piety undertaken by the lay Consciousness-only scholar Tang Dayuan, who opted for including doctrinal study in the practice of Pure Land Buddhism. Whereas Tang’s arguments for this case refer to the increasingly globalised and Westernised intellectual scene of Republican China, his reformist postulates mainly target the aforementioned exegetical and doctrinal assumptions that were shared by Yinguang and other Pure Land preachers. For example, Tang appears to sideline the dichotomy of principle (insight) and phenomena (practice) and opts instead for a unified standard of Pure Land practice grounded in doctrinal understanding. At the same time, he adduces Consciousness-only scholasticism to argue for a broader and more nuanced understanding of Buddhist wisdom, which includes discursive and communicable knowledge. In these respects Tang’s critique reveals a continuity between late imperial and modern Buddhist thought, both in terms of underlying concerns and the concepts that were used to articulate them.

References

  1. MFQ Minguo fojiao qikan wenxian jicheng 民國佛教期刊文献集成 [Complete Collection of Republican-era Buddhist Journals] 2006. Edited by Huang Xianian 黄夏年 et al., vol. 1–204. Beijing: Quanguo Tushuguan Wenxian Suowei Fuzhi Zhongxin.
  2. MFQB Minguo fojiao qikan wenxian jicheng bubian 民國佛教期刊文献集成補編 [Supplementary Complete Collection of Republican-era Buddhist Journals] 2008. Edited by Huang Xianian 黄夏年 et al., vol. 1–83. Beijing: Zhongguo shudian.
  3. T Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經 [New Edition of the Buddhist Canon published in the Taishō Era] [2023]. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭, vol. 1–85. Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association.
  4. WWQB Weishi wenxian quanbian 唯識文獻全編 [The Complete Anthology of Consciousness-only Texts] 2013. Edited by Wang Lianzhang 王聯章 et al, vol. 1–66. Beijing: Guojia Tushuguan.
  5. X Manji shinsan Dainippon zokuzōkyō 卍新纂大日本續藏經 [Manji Newly Compiled Supplementary Buddhist Canon of Great Japan] [2023]. Vol. 1–90. Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association.
  6. YFW Xinbian quanben Yinguang fashi wenchao 新編全本印光法師文鈔 [Newly Edited Complete Collected Works of Master Yinguang] 2009. Edited by Beijing Dafang Guang Huayan Shuju 北京大方廣華嚴書局, vol. 1–24. Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou Guji.
  7. Ouyang Jingwu 歐陽竟無 1977. Weishi jueze tan/Shengminglüe唯識抉擇談/聲明略 [Selected Talks on Consciousness-only/ An Outline of the Science of Sounds]. Taipei: Guangwen Shuju.
  8. Tang Dayuan 唐大圓 1927a. Weishi xinzhu si zhong 唯識新著四種 [Four New Books on Consciousness-only]. Shanghai: Qunzhong Tushu gongsi. [Reprint in: WWQB 65: 473–604].
  9. Tang Dayuan 唐大圓 1927b. Shi hai yi zhou 識海一舟 [A Boat on the Sea of Consciousness]. Shanghai: Taidong Tushuju [Reprint in: WWQB 66: 71-274].
  10. [Shi] Yinguang 印光 1989 [1928]. Yinguang dashi wenchao jinghua lu 印光大師文鈔菁華録 [Recorded Essentials from the Collected Works of Great Master Yinguang], edited by Li Jingtong 李淨通. Keelung: Shifang Dajue Si.
  11. Araki Kengo 荒木見悟 1985. Unsei Shukō no kenkyū 雲棲祩宏の研究 [A Study of Yunqi Zhuhong]. Tokyo: Daizō Shuppan.
  12. Aviv Eyal 2020. Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437913
  13. Chan, Wing-tsit 1953. Religious Trends in modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.
  14. Chappell, David W. 1986. ‘From Dispute to Dual Cultivation: Pure Land Responses to Ch’an Critics.’ In: Peter N. Gregory (ed.) Traditions of Meditation in Chinese Buddhism (Kuroda Institute Studies in East Asian Buddhism, no. 4). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824842932-007
  15. Chen Chien-huang 陳劍鍠 2002. Yuantong zhengdao. Yinguang de jingtu qihua 圓通證道: 印光的淨土啟化 [The Perfect Interprenetration and the Realization of the Way: Yinguang’s Propagation of the Pure Land]. Taibei: Dongda.
  16. Chen Chien-huang 陳劍鍠 2009. Xingjiao zouguo jingtu famen: Xingjiao zouguo jingtu famen: Tanluan, Taochuo yu Shandao kaizhan Mituo jingtu jiaomen zhi guiche行腳走過淨土法門: 曇鸞、道綽與善導開展彌陀淨土教門之軌轍 [Peregrinating towards the Gate of the Pure Land: How Tanluan, Daochuo and Shandao Established the Path of Amitābha Pure Land Doctrine]. Taibei: Shangzhou Chuban.
  17. Cun De 存德 2016. Jingtuzong jiaoli shiyao 淨土宗教理史要 [Essentials of the History of the Pure Land Doctrine]. Beijing: Zongjiao Wenhua Chubanshe.
  18. [Shi] Dongchu 東初, 1984. Zhongguo fojiao jindai shi 中國佛教近代史 [A Modern History of Chinese Buddhism], vol. 1–2. Dongchu laoren quanji 東初老人全集 [Collected Works of the Elder Dongchu] vol. 1. Taibei: Dongchu Chubanshe.
  19. Godart, Clinton 2008. ‘“Philosophy” or “Religion”? The Confrontation with Foreign Categories in Late Nineteenth Century Japan,’ Journal of the History of Ideas 69.1: 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2008.0008
  20. Hammerstrom, Erik 2014. ‘Yogācāra and Science in the 1920s: The Wuchang School’s Approach to Modern Mind Science.’ In: John Makeham (ed.) Transforming Consciousness. Yogācāra Thought in Modern China. New York: Oxford University Press, 170–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199358120.003.0007
  21. Hida Yoshifumi 飛田良文2002. Meiji umare no nihongo 明治生まれの日本語 [Meiji-Born Japanese Language]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.
  22. Huang Chi-chiang 黃啟江 2004. Yinguo, jingtu yu wangsheng: toushi zhongguo fojiaoshi de ji ge mianxiang 因果、淨土、與往生: 透視中國佛教史上的幾個面相 [Karman, Pure Land and Rebirth: An Examination of Several Facets of the History of Chinese Buddhism]. Taibei: Xuesheng.
  23. Jones, Charles B. 2003. ‘Transitions in the Practice and Defense of Chinese Pure Land Buddhism’. In: Steven Heine – Charles S. Prebish (eds.) Buddhism in The Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press, 125–142.
  24. Jones, Charles B. 2004. ‘Buddha One: A One-Day Buddha-Recitation Retreat in Contemporary Taiwan’. In: Richard K. Payne – Kenneth K. Tanaka (eds.) Approaching the Land of Bliss: Religious Praxis in the Cult of Amitābha. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824842987-011
  25. Jones, Charles B. (tr.) 2012. ‘Treatise Resolving Doubts About the Pure Land (Jingtu jueyi lun 凈土決疑論) by Master Yinguang 印光 (1861–1947),’ Pacific World (Third Series) 14: 27–61.
  26. Jones, Charles B. 2019. Chinese Pure Land Buddhism: Understanding a Tradition of Practice. Honolulu: Hawai’i University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv7r42t4
  27. Josephson, Jason Ananda 2012. The Invention of Religion in Japan. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
  28. Kiely, Jan 2017. ‘The Charismatic Monk and the Chanting Masses: Master Yinguang and his Pure Land Revival Movement.’ In: David Ownby – Vincent Goossaert – Ji Zhe (eds.) Making Saints in Modern China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 30–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190494568.003.0002
  29. Makeham, John, (ed.) 2014. Transforming Consciousness. Yogācāra Thought in Modern China. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199358120.001.0001
  30. Millican, F. R. 1929. ‘Recent Developments in Religious Thought.’ The China Christian Year Book 1929 (China Mission Year Book 16): 122–141.
  31. Miyagawa, Takayuki 宮川敬之 1998. ‘Chūgoku kindai butsugaku no kigen 中国近代仏学の起源’ [The Origins of Modern ‘Buddhology’ in China] Chūgoku tetsugaku kenkyū 中国哲学研究 12: 1–154.
  32. Muller, Charles 2014. ‘The Yogâcāra two Hindrances and their Reinterpretations in East Asia,’ Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 27.1: 207–235.
  33. Ogasawara Senshū 小笠原宣秀 1963. Chūgoku kinsei jōdokyō shi no kenkyū 中國近世淨土敎史の硏究 [Studies in the History of Early Modern Chinese Pure Land Buddhism]. Tokyo: Hyakkaen.
  34. Pittman, Don A. 2001. Toward a Modern Chinese Buddhism: Taixu's Reforms. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
  35. Sharf, Robert 2002. ‘On Pure Land Buddhism and Ch’an/Pure Land Syncretism in Medieval China,’ T’oung Pao 86: 282–331. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853202100368398
  36. [Shi] Shengyan 聖嚴 2000. Ming mo fojiao yanjiu 明末佛教研究 [Studies in Late Ming Buddhism]. Taibei: Fagu wenhua.
  37. Sueki Fumihiko 末木文美士 2004. Kindai Nihon to bukkyō 近代日本と仏教 [Modern Japan and Buddhism]. Tokyo: Transview.
  38. Suzuki, Daisetsu Teitarō 1935. ‘Impressions of Chinese Buddhism.’ The Eastern Buddhist 6.4: 327–378.
  39. Suzuki Shūji 鈴木修次2015. ‘Religion (shūkyō) and Freedom (jiyū)’. In: Joshua A. Fogel (ed. and tr.) The Emergence of the Modern Sino-Japanese Lexicon. Seven Studies. Leiden: Brill, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290525_005
  40. Toda, Dylan 2014. ‘Kindai bukkyō gainen o meguru ichi kōsatsu: 'Tetsugaku toshite no bukkyō' naru gensetsu no seisei to tenkai 近代仏教概念をめぐる一考察—「哲学としての仏教」なる言説の生成と展開,’ [Concerning One Aspect of the Modern Idea of Buddhism – The Origins and Development of the Discourse on Buddhism as Philosophy] Kindai bukkyō 近代仏教 21: 93–115.
  41. Welch, Holmes 1968. The Buddhist Revival in China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  42. Yin Xiaobin 尹曉彬 2011. ‘Tang Dayuan shengzu nian bianzheng 唐大圓生卒年辯證,’ [A Critical Examination of the Dates of Life and Death of Tang Dayuan] Lüliang xueyuan xuebao 呂梁學院學保 1.1: 52¬–56.
  43. Yu Lingbo 于凌波 2004. Xiandai fojiao renwu cidian 現代佛教人物辭典 [A Dictionary of Modern Buddhists]. 2 volumes. Sanchong: Foguang Wenhua.
  44. Yu Ying-shih 余英時 2018 [1975]. ‘Qingdai sixiangshi de yi ge xin jieshi 清代思想史的一個新解釋’ [A New Interpretation of the Intellectual History of the Qing Period]. In Lishi yu sixiang. Xinban 歷史與思想. 新版 [History and Thought. New Edition]. Taipei: Lianjing [Linking Books], 129–164.
  45. Yü, Chün-fang 1981. The Renewal of Buddhism in China: Chu-hung and the Late Ming Synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.
  46. Zhang Xuesong 張雪松 2011. Fayu Lingyan: Zhongguo fojiao xiandaihua lishi jincheng zhong de Yinguang fashi yanjiu 法雨靈岩: 中國佛教現代化歷史進程中的印光法師研究 [The Rain of Dharma and the Numinous Cliff: Master Yinguang within the Historical Process of Modernization of Chinese Buddhism – A Study]. Taibei: Fagu wenhua.