Vol. 13 No. 2021/2 (2022)
Articles

Attributes Related to Collectivism in Japanese Industrial Organizations in Hungary

Mónika Balogh
Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Faculty of Humanities, Doctoral School of Linguistics, Japanese Studies Programme
Bio

Published 2022-09-05 — Updated on 2022-09-06

Keywords

  • individualism,
  • collectivism,
  • groupism,
  • tateshakai,
  • independent self,
  • interdependent self,
  • conformity,
  • ingroup,
  • outgroup,
  • tatemae,
  • honne,
  • kosei
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Balogh, M. (2022). Attributes Related to Collectivism in Japanese Industrial Organizations in Hungary. Journal of East Asian Cultures, 13(2021/2), 49–85. https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2021.2.3

Abstract

The present article develops a view of attributes related to collectivism in Japanese industrial organizations (companies) located in Hungary, on the basis of fieldwork. After a short overview of research in the field of individualism and collectivism, several arguments and also incidents are presented which reveal the collectivistic nature of the examined social sample. The evaluation and analysis of the related phenomena will be conducted based on sociological concepts such as kojinshugi, 個人主義, dantaishugi, 団体主義, kosei, 個性, uchi, 内, soto, 外 and others. Both the concepts and the terminology used in monocultural and cross-cultural studies are examined, before being compared and differentiated from each other.

References

  1. Ando, Shirley 2009. „A look at nihonjinron: Theories of Japaneesness.” Otemae Journal 10: 33–42.
  2. Balogh Mónika 2019. „Szervezeti relációk a japán ipari vállalkozási kultúrában.” Távol-keleti Tanulmányok 11.2: 189–211. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.38144/TKT.2019.2.7
  3. Befu, Harumi 1980. „The Group Model of Japanese Society and an Alternative.” Rice Institute Pamphlet – Rice University Studies 66(1): 169–187.
  4. Brislin, Richard W. 2009. „Critical Incidents, and the Preparation of People for Intercultural Experiences” In: Wyer, Robert S. – Chiu, Chi-yue – Hong, Ying-yi (eds.) Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application. New York: Psychology Press, 379–392.
  5. Cai, Deborah A. – Fink, Edward L. 2002. „Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists.” Communication Monograph 69.1: 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216536
  6. Čeněk, Jiří. 2020. „Cultural Dimension of Individualism and Collectivism and Its Perceptual and Cognitive Correlates in Cross-Cultural Research.” Journal of Education Culture and Society 6.2: 210–225. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20152.210.225
  7. Cialdini, Robert B. – Wosinska, Wilhelmina – Barrett, Daniel W. – Butner, Jonathan – Gornik-Durose, Malgorzata 1999. „Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25.10: 1242–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258006
  8. Clammer, John 2003. „Globalisation, Class, Consumption and Civil Society in South-east Asian Cities.” Urban Studies 40: 403¬–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220080331
  9. Cohen, Dov – Kitayama, Shinobu (eds.) 2007. Handbook of cultural psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.
  10. Coon Heather M. – Kemmelmeier Marcus 2001. „Cultural Orientations in the United States: (Re)Examining Differences among Ethnic Groups.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32.3: 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003006
  11. D’Andrade, Roy G. 2008. A study of personal and cultural values: American, Japanese, and Vietnamese. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1037/e619482011-081
  12. de Mooij, Marieke – Hofstede, Geert 2010. „The Hofstede model: Applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research.” International Journal of Advertising: The Quarterly Review of Marketing Communications 29.1: 85–110. https://doi.org/10.2501/S026504870920104X
  13. de Mooij, Marieke 2004. Consumer Behaviour and Culture. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
  14. Doi, Takeo 1989. The Anatomy of Self. Tokyo and New York: Kodansha International Ltd.
  15. Doi, Takeo 2014. The Anatomy of Dependence. New York: Kodansha USA Inc.
  16. Földes Csaba 2007. „»Interkulturális kommunikáció«: koncepciók, módszerek, kérdőjelek.” Fordítástudomány 9.1: 14–39.
  17. Gaines, Stanley O., Jr. et al. 1997. „Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72.6: 1460–1476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1460
  18. Geertz, Clifford 2006. „Sűrű leírás. Út a kultúra értelmező elméletéhez.” In: Bohannan, Paul – Glazer, Mark (eds.) Mérföldkövek a kulturális antropológiában. Budapest: Panem, 711–741.
  19. Gelfand, Michele J. – Triandis, Harry C. – Chan, Darius K.-S. 1996. „Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism?” European Journal of Social Psychology 26(3): 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<397::AID-EJSP763>3.0.CO;2-J
  20. Goodenough, Ward H. 1964. „Explorations in cultural anthropology” In: Essays in Honor of George Peter Murdock. Ward H. (ed.) New York: McGraw–Hill Book Co.
  21. Gorodnichenko, Yuriy – Gerard, Roland 2013. „Understanding the individualism-collectivism cleavage and its effects: Lessons from cultural psychology.” Institutions and Comparative Economic Development 150: 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034014_12
  22. Habermas, Jürgen 2011. A kommunikatív cselekvés elmélete - Társadalomelmélet – kommunikációtudomány. Budapest: ELTE Szociológiai Intézet.
  23. Hamada, Tomoko 1992. „Under the silk banner: The Japanese company and its overseas managers” In: Lebra, Sugiyama, Takie (ed.) Japanese Social Organization. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 135–164.
  24. Hamaguchi Eshun 1996. Nihon bunka wa ishitsu ka. 日本の文化は異質か. [Más-e a japán kultúra]. Tōkyō: Nihon Hōsō Shuppan Gaisha.
  25. Hamaguchi, Eshun 1997. „A Methodological Basis for Japanese Studies – with Regard to Relatum as its Foundation.” Japan Review 9: 41–63.
  26. Hamamura, Takeshi – Bettache, Karim – Xu, Yi 2018. „Individualism and collectivism.” In: Hill V. Zeigler – Shackelford T. K. (eds.) The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Origins of personality and individual differences. Sage Reference, 365–382. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451200.n20
  27. Han, Shihui 2017. The sociocultural brain: A cultural neuroscience approach to human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743194.001.0001
  28. Hendry, Joy 1995. Understanding Japanese Society. London: Biddles Ltd., Guilford and King’s Lynn.
  29. Hidasi Judit 1992. „Japán. A Felkelő nap országa” In: Hidasi Judit (szerk.) 1992. Kultúra, viselkedés, kommunikáció: Külkereskedőknek, idegenvezetőknek, diplomatáknak, utazóknak. Budapest: Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, 159–182.
  30. Hidasi Judit 2003. Vissza Japánba. Budapest: Terebess Kiadó.
  31. Hidasi Judit 2004. Interkulturális kommunikáció. Budapest: Scolar Kiadó.
  32. Hidasi Judit 2007. „Japán” In: Hidasi Judit (szerk.) Kultúrák@kontextusok.kommunikáció. [h. n.]: Perfekt, 86–102.
  33. Hofstede, G. 2011. „Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2.1. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 (2021.05.10.)
  34. Hofstede, Geert 1983. „The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories.” Journal of International Business Studies 14.2: 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867
  35. Hofstede, Geert 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
  36. Hofstede, Geert 2011. „Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2.1. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  37. Hofstede, Geert. Definition of culture.
  38. Hong, Ying-yi 2009. „A Dynamic Constructivist Approach to Culture: Moving From Describing Culture to Explaining Culture.” In: Wyer, Robert S. – Chiu, Chi-yue – Hong, Ying-yi (eds.) Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application. New York: Psychology Press, 3– 24.
  39. https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/definition-culture/ (2021. 05. 14.)
  40. https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%87%BA%E3%82%8B%E6%9D%AD%E3%81%AF%E6%89%93%E3%81%9F%E3%82%8C%E3%82%8B-577183 (2021. 05. 10.)
  41. Hui, Harry C. 1988. „Measurement of Individualism–Collectivism.” Journal of Research in Personality 22: 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(88)90022-0
  42. Kent Pauline 1989. Tsumi no bunka to haji no bunka saikō. Bunka taishō to bunka hikaku. 罪の文化と恥の文化再考: 文化対照と文化比較. [A szégyen kultúrájának és a bűn kultúrájának újragondolása. A kultúrák kontrasztba állítása és összehasonlítása.] Faculty of Human Sciences, Osaka University - Annuals of Human Sciences 10: 71–87.
  43. Kiliç, Bülent – Kamaşak, Rifat 2009. „Factor Pattern of Auckland Individualism-Collectivism Questionnaire: A Study of Turkish Sample.” Isguc The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 11: 25–34. https://doi.org/10.4026/1303-2860.2009.0123.x
  44. Kotobank: Online Japán közmondások tára. A kiálló szöget beverik.
  45. Lanhem, Betty B. 1986. „Ethics and moral precepts taught in schools of Japan and the United States.” In: Lebra, Takie Sugiyama – Lebra, P. William (eds.): Japanese Culture and behavior. Selected readings. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 280 ̶ 296. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824841522-018
  46. Lebra, Takeyama S. 1976. Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824846404
  47. Makó Csaba – Nemes Ferenc 2002. „Paradigmaváltás a munkafolyamatban: poszt-fordizmus helyett neo-fordizmus.” Harvard Business Manager 1: 60–69.
  48. Makó Csaba – Novoszáth Péter 1992. „Tudásfelhasználás és munkaköri mobilitás összehasonlító vizsgálata.” Ergonómia: munkalélektan, munkaélettan, munkaszociológia 25(3): 1– 9.
  49. Markus, Hazel R. – Kitayama, Shinobu 1991. „Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.” Psychological Review 98(2): 224– 253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  50. Matsumoto, David – Weissman, Michelle D. – Preston, Ken – Brown, Bonny R. – Kupperbusch, Cenita 1997. „Context-Specific Measurement of Individualism-Collectivism on the Individual Level: The Individualism-Collectivism Interpersonal Assessment Inventory.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 28(6): 743 ̶ 767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022197286006
  51. Matsuyama, Kazuki 2016. Nihonjin Rōdōsha no shinrikōzō: kizokuishiki wo rikaisuru tameni. 日本人労働者の心理学:帰属意識を理化するために. [A japán munkavállalók pszichológiája: A szervezethez tartozás érzésének megértése érdekében.] Shōkeigakugi 63: 1 57– 81.
  52. Mesquita, Batja – Leu, Janxin 2007. „The Cultural Psychology of Emotion.” In: Cohen, Dov – Kitayama, Shinobu (eds.) Handbook of cultural psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, 734 ̶ 759.
  53. Miyazaki, Jun’ichi 2017. Nichiro kigyōbunka hikakukō. 日ロ企業文化比較考. [Gondolatok a japán és az orosz vállalati kultúra összevetésével kapcsolatosan.] Shakai kagaku zasshi. 18: 1 ̶ 46.
  54. Moeran, Brian 1976. „Individual, group and seishin: Japan’s Internal Cultural Debate.” In: Lebra, Sugiyama, Takie – Lebra William P. Japanese patterns of behaviour. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 62–79.
  55. Morales, Francisco – Gaviria, Elena – Molero, Fernando – Arias, Ana – Domínguez, José 2000. „Individualism: One or many?” Psicothema. Suplemento 12.1: 34–44.
  56. Morsbach, Helmut 1984. „Some socio-psychological aspect of Japanese society and culture today – the concept of harmony ( ’WA’).” In: Melanowicz, M. (ed.) Man and society in Japan today. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press, 205–214.
  57. Naito, Takashi – Gielen, Uwe 1992. „Tatemae and Honne: A Study of moral relativism in Japanese culture.” In: Gielen U. P. – Adler L. L. – Milgram N. (eds.) Psychology in international perspective. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger, 161–172.
  58. Nakane, Chie 1965. „Towards a theory of Japanese social structure: A unilateral society.” The Economic Weekly 17(5–7): 197–216.
  59. Nakane, Chie 1973. Japanese Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
  60. Nakane, Chie 1978. Tateshakai no rikigaku タテ社会の力学. [A vertikális társadalom mechanizmusai] Japan: Kōdansha Gendai Shinsho. Paperback Shinsho.
  61. Oetzel, John – Bardhan, Soumia – Kirschbaum, Kris 2007. „Intercultural Conflict from a Multilevel Perspective: Trends, Possibilities, and Future Directions.” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36: 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737124
  62. Oyserman, Daphna – Coon, Heather – Kemmelmeier, Markus 2002. „Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses.” Psychological Bulletin 128: 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
  63. Oyserman, Daphna – Lee, Spike W. S. 2008. „Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.” Psychological Bulletin 134.2: 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311
  64. Ozaki, Robert S. 1983. The Japanese, a cultural portrait. Rutland: Vt: Tuttle Company Inc.
  65. Papp Melinda 2014. „A család intézményének átalakulása az ünnepi szokások tükrében a háború előtti Japánban (1868–1945).” Távol-keleti Tanulmányok 6.1–2: 159–178.
  66. Papp, Melinda 2012. „Conspicuous consumption in postwar Japan: The case of a rite of passage.” Human Affairs 22: 196–213. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0017-0
  67. Papp, Melinda 2019. „Creating a ritual: objects, goods and services in Japanese childhood celebrations.” Japanese Religions 43: 1–28.
  68. Pinillos, María-José – Reyes, Luisa 2011. „Relationship between Individualist–Collectivist Culture and Entrepreneurial Activity: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data.” Small Business Economics 37.1: 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9230-6
  69. Pruitt Dean G. – Carnevale Peter J. 1993. Negotiation in Social Conflict. Pacific Grove, CA.: Brooks/Cole Publishers.
  70. Rahim, M. Afzalur 1983. „A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.” Academy of Management Journal 26.2: 368–376. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.5465/255985
  71. Salzman, Michael B. 2018. A Psychology of Culture. Honolulu, Hawaii: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69420-7
  72. Schwartz, Shalom H. 1994. „Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values.” In: Kim, Uichol – Triandis, Harry C. – Kâğitçibaşi, Çiğdem – Choi, Sang-Chin – Yoon, Gene (eds.) Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. California: Sage Publications, Inc. 85–119.
  73. Sedgwick, Mitchell W. 2013. „Secular Ethics and the Continuations of Capitalism: Fetishes of Production, Career Hierarchy, and the Cult of the Leader in Japanese Industrial Corporations.” Senri ethnological studies 82: 59–66.
  74. Singelis, Theodore M. – Triandis, Harry C. – Bhawuk, Dharm P. S. – Gelfand, Michele J. 1995. „Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement.” Cross-Cultural Research 29.3: 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302
  75. Smith Alfred G. 1966. Communication and culture: readings in the codes of human interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  76. Sodeberg, Anne Marie – Wilczewski, Michal 2017. „Badania Nad Komunikacją Międzykulturową: Dotychczasowe Paradygmaty i Perspektywy Badawcze.” Zeszyty Prasoznawcze 60.3: 540–566. https://doi.org/10.4467/22996362PZ.17.033.7330
  77. Sternberg, Robert 2007. „Intelligence and Culture.” In: Cohen, Dov – Kitayama, Shinobu (eds.) Handbook of cultural psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, 547–568.
  78. Sugimoto Yoshio 2010. An introduction to the Japanese Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  79. Trompenaars, Fons – Hampden-Turner, Charles 1993. Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business. New York: McGraw-Hill, 51–68.
  80. Wyer, Robert S. – Chiu, Chi-yue – Hong, Ying-yi (eds.) 2009. Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application. New York: Psychology Press.
  81. Yamaguchi, Susumu 1994. „Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self.” In: Kim, Uichol – Triandis, Harry C. – Kâğitçibaşi, Çiğdem – Choi, Sang-Chin – Yoon, Gene (eds.) Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. California: Sage Publications, Inc., 175–188.