Évf. 16 szám 2 (2024)
Tanulmányok

Preliminary Notes on the Mahāmudrātilaka: Contents, History, Transmission

Péter-Dániel Szántó
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Bio

Megjelent 2024-07-01

Kulcsszavak

  • tantrikus buddhizmus,
  • szanszkrit kéziratok,
  • Hevajra,
  • Mahāmudrātilaka,
  • yoginītantrák,
  • antinomista vallási gyakorlatok
  • ...Tovább
    Kevesebb

Hogyan kell idézni

Szántó, P.-D. (2024). Preliminary Notes on the Mahāmudrātilaka: Contents, History, Transmission. Távol-Keleti Tanulmányok, 16(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2024.2.5

Absztrakt

This short essay is an introduction to the study of the Mahāmudrātilaka (‘An Ornament of the Great Seal’), an important Buddhist tantric scripture of the Hevajra cycle. The text is a so-called uttaratantra (ancillary scripture) of the Hevajratantra. This cult emerged around ca. 900 CE in Eastern India and quickly rose to a position of prominence. In order to illustrate this point, first I discuss some historical references to the Hevajra cult: a lexicographical work, inscriptions, and testimony in Śaiva exegesis. I then contextualise the Mahāmudrātilaka among the Hevajra ancillary scriptures and share some notes on the purpose of such texts. I argue that such scriptures were meant to update a cult’s ritual and doctrinal palette in order to keep up with developments seen (and thought desirable to have) in rival schools. In the next section, I present the only known Sanskrit manuscript of the Mahāmudrātilaka, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Preußischer Kulturbesitz Orientabteilung Hs. or. 8711, a late Nepalese copy dated 1827 CE, which can be shown to be a copy of a Vorlage dating to 1204 CE. Next, I compare the text transmitted therein to the Tibetan translation, Tōh. 420, and identify them as two recensions. I then proceed to discussing exegesis on the Mahāmudrātilaka, the works of *Gambhīravajra and *Prajñāśrīgupta; these texts are for now available only in their Tibetan translation. I also identify some testimonia of the Mahāmudrātilaka. Using all this evidence, I argue that the text cannot be much earlier than the late 11th century. Next, I present an overview of the text by means of examining selected passages and their most significant features, with special focus on the differences and similarities with the Hevajratantra, the internal references to other scriptures, and the text’s significant parallels with the Vajramālābhidhāna. I argue that the text is unapologetically antinomian and gnostic. In the second half of the paper, styled as an appendix, I select five blocks of verses, which I edit and translate: the first deals with the relationship between initiating master and disciple, the second provides some insights into the attitudes of tantric practitioners towards orthodox Buddhists, the third contains detailed instructions on how to gather the antinomian substances known as ‘nectars’, the fourth deals with communal worship in a rite known as the gaṇacakra, and the final one describes a somewhat rare and rather gruesome ritual meant to bestow the power of flight.

Hivatkozások

  1. Tantrāloka of Abhinavagupta with the commentary of Jayaratha. Madhusudan Kaul Shastri and Mukunda Ram Shastri (eds.). 1918–1938. The Tantrāloka of Abhinava-gupta. With the Commentary by Rajanaka Jayaratha. 12 volumes (Kashmir Series of Texts and Studies). Bombay: The Indian Press.
  2. Trikāṇḍaśeṣa of Puruṣottamadeva. C.A. Seelakkh[a]ndha (ed.). 1916. The Trikāṇḍaśeṣa, A collection of Sanskrit Nouns by Sri Purushottamadeva, king of Kalinga, India. Bombay: Shri Venkateshwar Steam Press.
  3. Finot, Louis 1904. ‘Notes d’épigraphie XI: Les inscriptions de Mi-son.’ Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 4: 897–979. https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1904.1405
  4. Gray, David B. 2005. ‘Eating the Heart of the Brahmin: Representations of Alterity and the Formation of Identity in Tantric Buddhist Discourse.’ History of Religions 45.1: 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/497816
  5. Griffiths, Arlo 2014. ‘Inscriptions of Sumatra III. The Padang Lawas corpus studied along with inscriptions from Sorik Merapi (North Sumatra) and from Muara Takus (Riau).’ In: Daniel Perret (ed.) History of Padang Lawas North Sumatra II. Societies of Padang Lawas (Mid-ninth – Thirteenth century CE). Paris: Archipel, 211–262.
  6. Griffiths, Arlo – Péter-Dániel Szántó 2015. ‘Sarvabuddhasamāyogaḍākinījālaśaṃvara.’ In: Jonathan A. Silk et al. (eds.) Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Volume I: Literature and Languages. Leiden: Brill, 367–372. [online version:] https://doi.org/10.1163/2467-9666_enbo_COM_0033
  7. Kittay, David 2020. The Vajra Rosary Tantra (Śrī Vajramālā Tantra) by Vajradhara, An Explanatory Tantra of the Esoteric Community Tantra with Commentary by Alaṃkakalasha. New York & Somerville: American Institute of Buddhist Studies, Columbia University, and Wisdom Publications.
  8. Lobo, Wibke 1994. ‘Reflections on the Tantric Buddhist Deity Hevajra in Cambodia.’ In: Pierre-Yves Manguin (ed.) Southeast Asian Archaeology 1994: proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, Paris, 24th–28th October 1994. Volume II. Hull: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Hull, 113–127.
  9. Locke, John K., S.J. 1985. Buddhist Monasteries of Nepal. A Survey of the Bāhās and Bahīs of the Kathmandu Valley. Kathmandu: Sahayogi Press.
  10. Rhoton, Jared Douglas 2002. A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes. Essential Distinctions among the Individual Liberation, Great Vehicle, and Tantric Systems. The sDom gsum rab dbye and Six Letters. Edited by Victoria R. M. Scott. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  11. Sferra, Francesco 2000. The Ṣaḍaṅgayoga by Anupamarakṣita with Raviśrījñāna’s Guṇabharaṇīnāmaṣaḍaṅgayogaṭippaṇī, Text and annotated translation. (Serie Orientale Roma LXXXV.) Roma: Istituto italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente.
  12. Sugiki, Tsunehiko 2016. ‘Oblation, Non-conception, and Body: Systems of Psychosomatic Fire Oblation in Esoteric Buddhism in Medieval South Asia.’ In: Richard K. Payne – Michael Willis (eds.) Homa Variations, the Study of Ritual Change across the Longue Durée. New York: Oxford University Press, 167–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351572.003.0006
  13. Szántó, Péter-Dániel 2020. ‘On Vāgīśvarakīrti’s Influence in Kashmir and among the Khmer.’ In: Dominic Goodall – Shaman Hatley – Harunaga Isaacson – Srilata Raman (eds.) Śaivism and the Tantric Traditions. Essays in Honour of Alexis G.J.S. Sanderson. Leiden: Brill, 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432802_009
  14. Tomabechi, Toru 苫米地等流 2018. ‘Abhayākaragupta 作 Āmnāyamañjarī 所引文献 (2) – 新出梵文資料・第 5 章より [Quotations in Abhayākaragupta’s Āmnāyamañjarī Chapter 5; Extracted from a Newly Available Sanskrit-Tibetan Bilingual Manuscript].’ 川崎大師教学研究所紀要 Journal of Kawasaki Daishi Institute for Buddhist Studies 3: 1–23.
  15. Ui, Hakuju – Suzuki, Munetada – Kanakura, Yenshô – Tada, Tôkan. 1934. A Complete Catalogue of the Tibetan Buddhist Canons (Bkaḥ-ḥgyur and Bstan-ḥgyur). Sendai: Tôhoku Imperial University.
  16. Vidyavinoda, Vinoda Vihari 1913–1914. ‘Two Inscriptions from Bodh-Gaya.’ Epigraphia Indica 12: 27–30.
  17. Willemen, Charles 1983. The Chinese Hevajratantra. The Scriptural Text of the Ritual of the Great King of the Teaching, the Adamantine One with Great Compassion and Knowledge of the Void. Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters.
  18. Yokoyama, Hiroaki 横山裕明 2016. Ḍākinīvajrapañjara の文献学的研究 [Philological Study of Ḍākinīvajrapañjara] (Ph.D. diss., Taisho University).