Évf. 16 szám 2 (2024)
Tanulmányok

The cross-border perception of Bayising (Pansheng 板升) among government officials in Ming China

Yu-lung Tseng
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest
Bio

Megjelent 2024-07-01

Kulcsszavak

  • Bayising,
  • Hohhot,
  • Altan kán,
  • Jiajing,
  • 1571-es békeszerződés,
  • kínai–mongol kapcsolatok
  • ...Tovább
    Kevesebb

Hogyan kell idézni

Tseng, Y.- lung. (2024). The cross-border perception of Bayising (Pansheng 板升) among government officials in Ming China. Távol-Keleti Tanulmányok, 16(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2024.2.1

Absztrakt

The Mongol Yuan dynasty in China officially came to an end in 1368 with the withdrawal of the Mongols from the capital city Daidu (Beijing) and their retreat to the steppes. Nevertheless, a protracted series of military campaigns and conflicts between the Ming court and the Eastern Mongols, Oirat Mongols, and various other Mongol tribes continued for about 200 years. This article examines the discourse surrounding Bayising, where a group of Chinese people settled on Mongolian territory and served the Mongols during the mid-16th and early-17th centuries. The primary population of Bayising consisted of Chinese individuals who had either fled from China or were captives taken by the Mongols from China in border raids. Bayising embodies a unique interaction between China and nomadic communities in a transitional zone between the steppe and agricultural land, where conventional trading and tribute systems encountered difficulties in establishment. After the signing of the 1571 peace treaty, Bayising gradually receded from the focus of the Ming court. Through an analysis of historical documents and records, this article unveils the perspectives held by Ming officials regarding Bayising. Additionally, it probes into how these perspectives influenced Ming China’s foreign relations and national security policies concerning the Mongols. The emergence of Bayising was rooted in a distinctive historical context. Moreover, Bayising played an important role not only in shaping Sino-Mongol relations but also in facilitating cooperation between nomadic and agricultural communities in the absence of official trade channels. Neither repatriation nor military intervention proved to offer fundamental solutions to the Bayising issue in the ongoing confrontation between the Mongols and the Ming court. However, the establishment of normalised and stabilised trade, facilitated by a mutually beneficial peace treaty, emerged as a definitive solution that ultimately benefited both parties. This intricate interplay between geopolitical dynamics and cultural exchanges underscores the complexity of historical narratives, emphasizing the enduring impact of the Ming officials’ perception of the Mongols on regional stability and economic prosperity.

Hivatkozások

  1. BDSYWADXB: Beidi Shunyiwang Anda Xiebiao/Jiaoli Jiaoping shilüe 北狄順義王俺答謝表/交黎剿平事略 [A Letter of Gratitude from King Shunyi of North Di/The suppression of Jiaoli]. Taipei: Cheng Chung Book Company, 1981.
  2. DSFYJY: Dushi Fangyu Jiyao讀史方輿紀要 [Essentials of Geography for Reading History]. Taipei: Hong Shi Publishing House, 1981.
  3. HMBLK: Huang Ming Beilu Kao皇明北虜考 [Investigation on Northern Barbarian of Royal Ming] (collected in Mingdai Menggu Hanji Shi liao Huibian Vol. 1明代蒙古漢籍史料滙編第一輯). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press, 2006.
  4. HMJLSC: Huang Ming Jialong Shu Chao 皇明嘉隆疏抄 [Collection of Memorials to the Throne during Jiajing and Longqi Reign] (collected in Xuxiu Siku Quanshu續修四庫全書 Vol. 466–467). Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House, 2002.
  5. HMJSWB: Huang Ming Jingshi Wen Bian 皇明經世文編 [Collection of State and Society Servicing articles of Royal Ming Dynasty] (collected in Si Ku Jin Hui Shu Cong Kan四庫禁燬書叢刊 Jibu 集部Vol. 22–29). Beijing: Beijing Publishing House, 1997.
  6. Ming Shizhong Shilu 明世宗實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty-Shizhong]. Taiwan: Academia Sinica, 1965.
  7. Ming Muzhong Shilu 明穆宗實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty-Muzhong]. Taiwan: Academia Sinica, 1965.
  8. Ming Shenzhong Shilu 明神宗實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty-Shenzhong]. Taiwan: Academia Sinica, 1965.
  9. Ming Xizhong Shilu 明熹宗實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty-Xizhong]. Taiwan: Academia Sinica, 1965.
  10. MS: Ming Shi 明史 [The History of the Ming Dynasty]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuji, 1974.
  11. MSJSBM: Mingshi Jishi Benmo 明史記事本末 [Historical events from the Ming period in their entirety]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 2015.
  12. SYCHZK: Sanyun Chouzukao三雲籌俎考 [Study on the three Yun] (collected in Xuxiu Siku Quanshu續修四庫全書 Vol. 739). Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House, 2002.
  13. WLWGL: Wali wugonglu 萬曆武功錄 [Campaigns of the Wanli Emperor] (collected in Xuxiu Siku Quanshu續修四庫全書 Vol. 436). Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House, 2002.
  14. Yiyu 譯語 [Translation of Language] (collected in Mingdai Menggu Hanji Shi liao Huibian Vol. 1明代蒙古漢籍史料滙編第一輯). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press, 2006.
  15. Bagne, D. J. 1969. Principles of Demography. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  16. Cao, Yongnian 曹永年1980. ‘Aletanhan He Fengzhouchuan De Zaidu Bannong Banmu Hua 阿勒坦汗和丰州川的再度半农半牧化 [Altan Khan along with the semi-agriculturalized and semi-pastoralized land of Fengzhou].’ Neimenggudaxue Xuebao–Zhexueshehuikexue Ban 内蒙古大学学报–哲学社会科学版 Z1: 132–143.
  17. Elverskog, Carl Johan 2000. Buddhism, history and power: The Jewel Translucent Sutra and the formation of Mongol identity. (PhD diss., Indiana University). Ann Arbor: Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company.
  18. Hagiwara, Jyunpei 萩原淳平1955. ‘Arutan・Kān to bansyō’ アルタン・カーンと板升’ [Altan Khan and Pan-Sheng (板升)]. Tōyōshikenkyū 東洋史研究 14.3: 187–199. https://doi.org/10.14989/139050
  19. Huang, Li-Sheng 黃麗生1995. You Junshizhenglüe Dao Chengshimaoyi: Neimenggu Guisui Diqu De Shehui Jingji Bianqian (Shisishiji Zhong Zhi Ershishiji Chu) 由軍事征掠到城市貿易: 內蒙古歸綏地區的社會經濟變遷 (14世紀中至20世紀初) [From War and Pillage to Citied Trade: A Study on Social-Economic Change of Kweihwa Suiyuan Area in Inner Mongolia (Mid 14th C– Early 20th C)]. Taipei: Institute of History of National Taiwan Normal University.
  20. Baddeley, J. F. 1919. Russia, Mongolia, China, Vol. II. London: MacMillian and Company.
  21. Jurungγa 珠荣嘎2014. Aletan Han Zhuan (Erdeni tunumal neretü sudur orošiba) 阿勒坦汗传 [Biography of Altan Khan]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press.
  22. Li, Zhuo-Nan 李作南 – Li, Ren-Xiao 李仁孝 2007. ‘Neimenggu Hanyufangyan Zhong Di Fanjieci 内蒙古汉语方言中的返借词 [Reloaned Words in the Chinese Dialect in Inner Mongolia].’
  23. Neimenggudaxue Xuebao–Renwenshehuikexue ban 内蒙古大学学报–人文社会科学版 39.4: 17–22.
  24. Serruys, Henry 1959. ‘Chinese in Southern Mongolia during the Sixteenth Century.’ Monumenta Serica 18: 1–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.1959.11730985
  25. Serruys, Henry 1962. ‘Mongol Altan “Gold” = “Imperial”’. Monumenta Serica 21: 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.1962.11731026
  26. Takumi, Nagai 永井匠2001. ‘Ryūkei Wagi to Uyoku Mongoru no Kanjin 隆慶和議と右翼モンゴルの漢人 [The Long-qing Peace Treaty and the Chinese among the Right-wing Mongols].’ Shikan史觀 145: 21–34.
  27. Temule, Temur 2016. ‘The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia.’ International Journal of Korean History 21.1: 121–156. https://doi.org/10.22372/ijkh.2016.21.1.121
  28. Xu, Hui-Jun 许慧君2012. ‘Mingdai Bansheng De Shehui Xiaoying Yu Lishi Yingxiang 明代板升的社会效应与历史影响 [The Social Effects and Historical Influence of Baishin in Ming Dynasty].’ Neimenggudaxue Xuebao–Zhexueshehuikexue ban内蒙古大学学报–哲学社会科学版 44: 23–26.