Visual word recognition patterns of Hungarian-English bilinguals

Visual word recognition patterns of Hungarian-English bilinguals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2023.1.2

Keywords:

EEG, EKP, bilingual visual word recognition, linguistic and lexical decision test, word order effect

Abstract

As part of a larger study, this paper investigates the brain event-related potential components (EKPs) of written word recognition in case of bilinguals. It illustrates what happens in the brain at the orthographic, phonological and semantic levels of word recognition with lexical decision test results. The research questions address the temporal aspects of the written versions of the two languages in the processes of visual word recognition and the role of phonology in word recognition. We tested 23 Hungarian-English bilinguals, all of whom have a C1 level of English and use English daily at work or school. Results show different processing patterns in the identification of meaningful words and meaningless letters in the parietal and occipital lobes in the early (150-200 ms) and late (200-250 ms) stages of the N170 EKP component, which is the initial stage of word recognition. This means that the decision on word similarity occurs around 200-250 ms after stimulus presentation, when orthographic-phonological processing takes place. At this stage, however, participants can only decide whether the sequence of letters on the screen is a word or not. The linguistic classification of the word is only done later.

References

Aitchison, Jean 1987. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Basil Blackwell. Oxford.

Appel, René – Muysken, Pieter 1987. Language contact and bilingualism. Edward Arnold. London–New York–Sydney–Auckland.

Assadollahi, Ramin – Pulvermuller, Friedemann 2003. Early influences of word length and frequency: a group study using MEG. Neuroreport 14: 1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200306110-00016

Besner, Derek – Smith, Marilyn C. 1992. Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18 (3), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.468

Carreiras, Manuel – Armstrong, Blair C. – Perea, Manuel – Frost, Ram 2013. The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18/2: 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005

Carter, Rita 2009. The Human Brain Book: An Illustrated Guide to its Structure Function, and Disorders. DK Publishing. London.

Csépe Valéria. 2006. Az olvasó agy. Akadémiai Kiadó. Budapest.

Dambacher, Michael – Kliegl, Reinhold – Hofmann, Markus – Jacobs, Arthur M. 2006. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Res 1084: 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010

Davis, Colin. J. 2012. The orthographic similarity of printed words. In: Adelman, J. S. (ed.) Visual Word Recognition Volume 1. Available from: VitalSource Bookshelf. Taylor & Francis.

De Groot, Annette M. B. 2011. Language and Cognition in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Psychology Press. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841228

De Groot, Annette M. B. – Delmaar, Philip – Lupker, Stephen 2000. The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 53/2: 397–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/027249800390547

Dijkstra, Ton – Van Heuven, Walter J. B. 1998. The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In: Grainger, Jonathan – Jacobs, Arthur M. (eds.) Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum. Maywah. 189–225.

Dijkstra, Ton – Heuven, Walter B. Van 2002. The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5: 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012

Duyck, Wouter. 2005. Translation and associative priming with cross-lingual pseudohomophones: Evidence for nonselective phonological activation in bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31/6: 1340–1359. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1340

Elston-Guttler, Kerrie. E. – Gunter, Thomas C. – Kotz, Sonja A. 2005. Zooming into L2: global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25: 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.007

Grant, Angela – Legault, Jennifer – Li, Ping 2019. What Do Bilingual Models Tell Us About the Neurocognition of Multiple Languages? In: Schwieter, John W. (ed.) The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism. Wiley. Hoboken. 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119387725.ch3

Grosjean, Francis 1989. Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language 36/1: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5

Grosjean, Francis 2001. The Bilingual′s Language Modes. In: Nicol, Janet L. (ed.) One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing. Blackwell Publishing. 1–22.

Grosjean, Francis 2010. Bilingual: Life and reality. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674056459

Grosjean, Francis – Li, Ping 2013. The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism. Wiley-Blackwell. Chichester.

Halderman, Lauren. K. – Ashby, Jane – Perfetti, Charles A. 2012. An Early and Integral Role in Identifying Words. In: Adelman, J. S. Visual Word Recognition Volume 1. Available from: VitalSource Bookshelf, Taylor & Francis, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107010

Hoversten, Liv J. – Brothers, Trevor – Swaab, Tamara Y. – Trayler, Matthew J. 2017. Early processing of orthographic language membership information in bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia 103: 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.026

Huth, Alexander G. – Heer, Wendy A. – Griffiths, Thomas L. – Theunissen, Frederic E. – Gallant, Jack L. 2016. Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature 532/7600: 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17637

Issa, Mohamed F. – Csizmadia, Zoltán – Juhasz, Zoltán – Kozmann, Gyögy 2017. EEG-assisted Reaction Time Measurement Method for Bilingual Lexical Access Study Experiments. Measurement 2017 Conference. Smolenice, Slovakia, May 2017. https://doi.org/10.23919/MEASUREMENT.2017.7983578

Jared, Debra – Kroll, Judit 2001. Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language 44/1: 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2747

Laszlo, Sarah – Armstrong, Blair C. 2013. Applying the dynamics of postsynaptic potentials to individual units in simulation of temporally extended ERP reading data. In: Knauff, M. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. 2826–2831.

Lemhöfer, Kristin – Dijkstra, Ton 2004. Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory & Cognition 32/4: 533–550. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195845

Macizo, Pedro – Bajo, Teresa M. – Cruz Martín, María 2010. Inhibitory processes in bilingual language comprehension: Evidence from Spanish–English interlexical homographs. Journal of Memory and Language 63/2: 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.04.002

Marian, Viorica – Blumenfeld, Henrike K. – Kaushanskaya, Margarita 2007. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 50/4: 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

Marian, Viorica – Spivey, Michael – Horsch, Joy 2003. Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging. Brain and Language 86: 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00535-7

Maurer, Urs – Brandeis, Daniel – McCandliss, Bruce D. 2005. Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behavioral Brain Function 1: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-1-13

McClelland, James L. – Rumelhart, David E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88/5: 375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375

Miwa, Koji – Baayen, Harald 2021. Nonlinearities in bilingual visual word recognition: An introduction to generalized additive modeling. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24: 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000079

Murthy, Lalita 1989. The Representation of Hyponyms in the Bilingual′s Mental Lexicon. A Psycholinguistic Study. Unpublished Dissertation. Hyderabad. CIEFL.

Nattinger, James 1988. Some Current Trends in Vocabulary Teaching. In: Carter, Ronald – McCarthy, Michael (eds.) Vocabulary and Language Teaching, Longman. London. 62–82.

Navracsics, Judit – Sáry Gyula 2013. Vizuális szófelismerés a kétnyelvűségben. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány 13/1–2: 75–91.

Navracsics, Judit. 2007 Word classes and the bilingual mental lexicon. In: Lengyel, Zsolt – Navracsics, Judit (eds.) Second Language Lexical Processes: Applied linguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 17–39. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599682-004

Pavlenko, Aneta 2009. Conceptual Representation in the Bilingual Lexicon and Second Language Vocabulary Learning in the Bilingual Mental Lexicon. In: Pavlenko, Aneta (ed.) TheBilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary Approaches Multilingual Matters. Bristol. 125–160. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691262-008

Peeters, David – Vanlangendonck, Flora – Rueschemeyer, Shirley-Ann – Dijkstra, Ton 2018. Activation of the language control network in bilingual visual word recognition. CORTEX 111: 63–73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.012.

Perea, Manuel – Rosa, Eva – Gómez, Consolación 2005. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics 67/2: 301–314. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206493

Sand, Katrine – Habekost, Thomas – Petersen, Anders – Starrfelt, Randi. 2016. The Word Superiority Effect in central and peripheral vision, Visual Cognition, DOI:10.1080/13506285.2016.1259192

Schmid, Monika S. 2010. Languages at play: the relevance of L1 attrition to the study of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990368

Schwartz, Ana I. – Kroll, Judith F. – Diaz, Michele 2007. Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes 22: 106–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500463920

Simos, Panagiotis G. – Breier, Joshua I. – Fletcher, Jack M. – Foorman, Barbara R. – Castillo, Eduardo M. – Papanicaolao, Andrew C. 2002. Brain Mechanisms for Reading Words and Pseudowords: An Integrated Approach. Cerebral Cortex 12/3: 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/12.3.297

Singleton, David. 1999. Exploring the Second Language Mental Lexicon. CUP. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524636

Starrfelt, Randi – Petersen, Anders – Vangkilde, Signe 2013. Don′t words come easy? A psychophysical exploration of word superiority. Frontiers Human Neuroscience 2013/7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00519/full (2022. augusztus 8.) https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00519

Treisman, Anne. M. 1961. Attention and speech. PhD dissertation. Oxford University.

Van Assche, Eva – Duyck, Wouter – Hartsuiker, Robert – Diependaele, Kevin 2009. Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological Science 20: 923–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x

Van Heuven, Walter. J. B. – Dijkstra, Ton 2001. The semantic, orthographic, and phonological interactive activation model. Poster presented at the 12th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. Edinburgh.

Yum, Yen. N. – Law, Sam-Po 2021. N170 reflects visual familiarity and automatic sublexical phonological access in L2 written word processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24: 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000759

(1) Oxford Dictionary. www.oxforddictionaries.com (2022. augusztus 5.)

Downloads

Published

2023. 03. 31.

How to Cite

Ihász, P., Benyhe, A., Sáry, G., Juhász, Z., & Navracsics, J. (2023). Visual word recognition patterns of Hungarian-English bilinguals. First Language Pedagogy, 16(1.), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2023.1.2

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...