Possibilities for investigating the process of composition writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2023.4.3Keywords:
composition writing, secondary school students, pausing during composition writingAbstract
It may be important in the future of secondary school students′ lives how they are able to compose various texts within a given time. If we investigate the details of the process of writing compositions, it may contribute to the more effective development of students′ writing skills. The aim of this pilot research is to test a method that follows the process of written text production. This research project examined the composition writing process of ten eleventh-grade secondary school students in front of a computer. This operation was recorded by the students using screen capture, allowing for the identification of pauses in thinking during text production. The secondary school students took similar pauses during composition writing when performing tasks with lower and higher cognitive demands. The results of the pilot study indicate that there is a need to enhance the writing skills of secondary school students.
References
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M. 2013. What do we mean by writing fluency and how can it be validly measured? Applied Linguistics 34(1): 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams073
Bárdossy Ildikó – Dudás Margit – Pethőné Nagy Csilla – Priskinné Rizner Erika 2002. A kritikai gondolkodás fejlesztése: Az interaktív és reflektív tanulás lehetőségei. Pécsi Tudományegyetem. Pécs–Budapest.
Bourdin, Béatrice – Fayol, Michel 1994. Is Written Language Production More Difficult Than Oral Language Production? A Working Memory Approach. International Journal of Psychology 29(5): 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599408248175
Brown, Douglas H. 1994. Teaching by principles: An interaction approach to language pedagogy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Caramazza, Alfonso 1991. Issues in reading, writing, and speaking: A neuropsychological perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3740-9
Chenoweth, Ann N. – Hayes, John R. 2001. Fluency in writing. Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication 18: 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004
Derwing, Tracey M. – Munro, Murray J. 2015. Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 50:1. 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42
Dustman, Christian 1994. Speaking fluency, writing fluency and earnings of migrants. Journal of Population Economics 7: 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173616
Faigley, Lester L. – Witte, Stephen P. 1983. Evaluating college writing programs. Southern Illinois University Press. Carbondale and Edwardsville.
Farkas Vilmos 1962. A többtagú (halmozott) mondatrészek. A Mai magyar nyelv rendszere: Leíró nyelvtan II. Akadémiai Kiadó. Budapest.
Flower, Linda – Hayes, John R. 1980. Identifying the organization of writing processes. In: Gregg, L. W. – Steinberg, E. R. (ed.) Cognitive processes in writing. Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale. 3–30.
Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.) 1980. Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. Academic Press. New York.
Gillam, Ronald B. – Johnston, Judith 1992. Spoken and written language relationships in language learning impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 1303–1315. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3506.1303
Gósy Mária 2003. A spontán beszédben elforduló megakadásjelenségek gyakorisága és összefüggései. Magyar Nyelvőr 127: 257–277.
Hayes, John. R. 1996. A new model of cognition and affect in writing. ln: Levy, C. Michael – Ransdell, Sarah. (eds.) The science of writing. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ. 1–27.
Johnson, Mark. D. – Mercado, Leonardo – Acevedo, Anthony 2012. The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 21/3: 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.011
Kaufer, David. S. – Hayes, John. R. – Flower, Linda 1986. Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English 20: 121–140.
Knoch, Ute. 2007. Diagnostic writing assessment: the development and validation of a rating scale. Ph.D. disszertáció. The University of Auckland. New Zealand.
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. A Bradford Book. Cambridge. Massachusetts.
Lorch, Majorie 2013. Written Language Production Disorders: Historical and Recent Perspectives. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 13(369). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-013-0369-9
Nauclér, Kerstin – Söderpalm, Ewa 1978. Slips of the tongue, slips of the pen – slips of the brain? Working papers 21: 95–108. https://doi.org/10.7146/aripuc.v12i.131678
Sasaki, Miyuki. 2000. Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: an exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 9:3. 259–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00028-X
Spelman Miller, K. 2000. Academic writers on-line: Investigating pausing in the production of text. Language Teaching Research 4/2: 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1191/136216800675510135
Szilassy Eszter 2012. Az írás és a fogalmazásalkotás stratégiái. Anyanyelv-pedagógia 5/1. https://www.anyanyelv-pedagogia.hu/cikkek.php?id=357 (2023. október 6.) https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2012.1.5
Tóth Beatrix 2008. Fogalmazástanítás – miért és hogyan másképpen? Anyanyelv-pedagógia 1/1. https://www.anyanyelv-pedagogia.hu/cikkek.php?id=15 (2023. október 26.) https://doi.org/10.21030/anyp.2008.1.2
Van Waes, Luuk – Leijten, Marielle 2015. Fluency in Writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and composition 38: 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kornélia Gyenei

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of articles published in the journal belongs to the author. The journal has the right of first publication. The published work is licensed under Creative Commons License “Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC 4.0). This means that copying, redistribution, remixing, transformation and building upon the published work is allowed for any purpose except commercial purposes as long as proper credit is given to the author, a link to the licence is provided, and any changes made to the original work are indicated.
The journal Anyanyelv-pedagógia [First Language Pedagogy] does not charge authors any fees for the processing, submission, or publication of articles. All writings published in the journal become freely accessible immediately after their publication.