Argumentation in the first phase of the Széchenyi‒Kossuth debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2024.2.129Keywords:
Széchenyi–Kossuth debate, rhetorical analysis, rhetorical situation, argumentation, styleAbstract
The study examines the argumentation of the Széchenyi–Kossuth debate's first phase. The method of the examination is rhetorical analyses. The hypotheses of the study are also related to this method: (1) the rhetorical analysis is suitable for analysing the debate since (2) the Széchenyi‒Kossuth debate was in fact a rhetorical event. While in the process of the exploring the rhetorical situation and the structure of the debate, the study considered the whole debate, the detailed analysis of the argumentation and the comments on style and presentation are valid only for the two books that represent the first phase of the debate. In addition to the classical rhetoric, the analysis takes also the new rhetoric of the 20th century and modern theories of argumentation into account.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tamás Lózsi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Magyar Nyelv is a Diamond Open Access periodical. Documents can be freely downloaded and duplicated in an electronic format, and can be used unchanged and with due reference to the original source. Such use must not serve commercial purposes. In the case of any form of dissemination and use, Hungarian Copyright Act LXXVI/1999 and related laws are to be observed. The electronic version of the journal is subject to the regulations of CC BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons – Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives).
The journal permits its authors, at no cost and without any temporal limitation, to make pre-print copies of their manuscripts publicly available via email or in their own homepage or that of their institution, or in either closed or free-for-all repositories of their institutions/universities, or other non-profit websites, in the form accepted by the journal editor for publication and even containing amendments on the basis of reviewers’ comments. When the authors publicize their papers in this manner, they have to warn their readers that the manuscript at hand is not the final published version of the work. Once the paper has been published in a printed or online form, the authors are allowed (and advised) to use that (post-print) version for the above purposes. In that case, they have to indicate the exact location and other data of the journal publication. The authors retain the copyright of their papers; however, in the case of an occasional secondary publication, the bibliographical data of the first publication have to be included.
