Fragment of a Latin grammar and its Hungarian glosses from the archives of the convent of Kolozsmonostor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2025.4.495Keywords:
medieval schoolbook, doctrinale, glosses, Hungarian-Latin bilingualism, codex fragmentsAbstract
In the Benedictine monastery of Kolozsmonostor (today Cluj-Mănăștur), a public authentication office operated from the first half of the 14th century to the middle of the 16th century. The authentication office issued legal documents and copied their texts into protocols. Two bifolia, which are to be presented in the study, were used as covers for protocols containing the copies of charters issued between 1447 and 1450 (HU-MNL-OL-DL 36391). These folios come from Alexander de Villa Dei’s textbook entitled Doctrinale puerorum. The protocols recorded on the spot may have been covered by leaves of locally used codices, so the grammar fragment can provide a glimpse into the educational situation in Kolozsmonostor/Kolozsvár (today Cluj-Napoca). The significance of the fragment is enhanced by the glosses in Hungarian that it contains, which do not only support the Hungarian provenance of the former codex copied in the 14th century but also enrich the range of old language records of Hungarian. The native entries can be seen in interlinear positions of four lines in the preserved section of the grammar book that lists certain Latin verbs as examples. These glosses contain synonyms and nouns in the accusative in Latin as well. One of the users of the book – perhaps in order to make the verbs easier to memorize, or perhaps with the aim of expanding their vocabulary – glossed a few lines (although not carefully enough in some respects). In this study, we investigate written bilingualism and define the place of the entry in the system of language records. Then we present the Hungarian verbs of the glosses one by one, and we list the above-mentioned Latin glosses as well. Since the language record investigated originates from the 16th century or a few decades before that, we also try to draw conclusions from comparisons with the earliest Hungarian dictionaries.
References
Magyar Nemzeti Levéltár Országos Levéltára: HU-MNL-OL-DL 36391. Kolozsmonostori protocollum „c minus” 1447–1450. https://archives.hungaricana.hu/hu/charters/161004
HU-MNL-OL-DF 204661. Bordézsmajegyzék, 1447. https://archives.hungaricana.hu/hu/charters/156291
Parisella 2009. H. Cambridge, Peterhouse 215.
Parisella 2009. B. Bodleian Library Rawl G. 96.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 10. Württembergische Landesbibliothek, Stuttgart, Cod. poet. et phil. quart 58.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 11. Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Pal. lat. 1764.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 12. Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Ms. Lat. cl. XII, 109 (=4099).
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 13. Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Latin 18523.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 20. Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. XXV, Sin. 5.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 22. British Library, Arundel MS 394.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 24. Oxford, Corpus Christi College, 121.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 30. BSB, Clm 14354.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 57*. Cambridge, Universitary Library, Oo. 6. 110.
Reichling kiad. 1893: nr. 66. Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Cod. 2443.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adrienne Dömötör, Fanni Hende

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Magyar Nyelv is a Diamond Open Access periodical. Documents can be freely downloaded and duplicated in an electronic format, and can be used unchanged and with due reference to the original source. Such use must not serve commercial purposes. In the case of any form of dissemination and use, Hungarian Copyright Act LXXVI/1999 and related laws are to be observed. The electronic version of the journal is subject to the regulations of CC BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons – Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives).
The journal permits its authors, at no cost and without any temporal limitation, to make pre-print copies of their manuscripts publicly available via email or in their own homepage or that of their institution, or in either closed or free-for-all repositories of their institutions/universities, or other non-profit websites, in the form accepted by the journal editor for publication and even containing amendments on the basis of reviewers’ comments. When the authors publicize their papers in this manner, they have to warn their readers that the manuscript at hand is not the final published version of the work. Once the paper has been published in a printed or online form, the authors are allowed (and advised) to use that (post-print) version for the above purposes. In that case, they have to indicate the exact location and other data of the journal publication. The authors retain the copyright of their papers; however, in the case of an occasional secondary publication, the bibliographical data of the first publication have to be included.