Could we gain new insight into the discovery of the Leuven Codex?
The Rosenthal and Olschki families in the 19th–21st centuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2025.3.332Keywords:
Leuven Codex, Lament of Mary, Jacques Rosenthal, Leo S. OlschkiAbstract
This paper aims to promote further inquiry into the following issue: Where did the Leuven Codex, containing the earliest surviving Hungarian poem, the Old Hungarian Lament of Mary, hide before its discovery in the 20th century? The first well-established event in the history of this codex is that, in 1910, it was purchased in Toscana by Jacques Rosenthal, an antiquarian from Munich. In 1922, the book was transferred to the library of the University of Leuven (hence the name of the codex). Finally, since 1982, it has been stored in the National Széchényi Library in Budapest, under catalogue number MNy 79. – A new avenue of research may be opened by a monograph presenting the history of the Rosenthal family (Angermair et al. 2002). It describes the extraordinary antiquarian activities of Jacques Rosenthal and his descendants, including friendly and familial relations (dating back to the beginning of the 20th century) between Jacques Rosenthal and Leo Olschki, an antiquarian from Florence. This Florence link undoubtedly deserves close inspection for gaining new insight into the history of the codex. By sharing key information about the Rosenthal and Olschki families, the paper aims to give new impetus to research on the codex’s history prior to 1910.
References
Angermair, Elisabeth 2002a. Der Kunsthistoriker Erwin Rosenthal in der Firma Jacques Rosenthal. In: Angermair et alii: 165–173.
Angermair, Elisabeth 2002b. Fertreibung – Emigration – Deportation: Das Schicksal der Familienzweige und ihrer Firmen während der NS-Zeit. In: Angermair et alii: 179–201.
Angermair, Elisabeth 2002c. Die Antiquariatshäuser Rosenthal nach 1945 – ein Ausblick. In: Angermair et alii: 215–228.
Angermair, Elisabeth 2002d. Anhang. Kataloge und Listen des Antiquariats Jacques Rosenthal (1895–1940). In: Angermair et alii: 240–244.
Angermair, Elisabeth – Koch, Jens – Löffelmeier, Anton – Ohlen, Eva – Schwab, Ingo 2002. Die Rosenthals. Der Aufstieg einer jüdischen Antiquarsfamilie zu Weltruhm. Böhlau Verlag, Wien – Köln – Weimar.
Bárczi Géza 1947. A Leuveni Kódex történetének legújabb szakasza. Magyar Nyelv 43: 301–305.
Buscaglia, Alessandro 2019. Il piacere di fare (e leggere) un libro. Intervista a Daniele Olschki, 30 maggio 2019.
Gragger Róbert 1923a. Ómagyar Máriasiralom. Magyar Nyelv 19: 1–13. – Önállóan: A Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Kiadványai 19. Budapest, 1923.
Gragger, Róbert 1923b. Eine altungarische Marienklage. Ungarische Jahrbücher 3: 27–46. – Önállóan: Ungarische Bibliothek 7. Berlin–Leipzig, 1923.
Haader Lea 2024. Az Ómagyar Mária-siralom scriptoráról – avagy következtetések egy „biografikus tárgy” nyomán. Magyar Nyelv 120: 7–16. https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2024.1.7
Horváth János 1923/2009. Magyar vers az Árpád-kor végéről. In: Horváth János irodalomtörténeti és kritikai munkái 5. Szerkesztette Korompay H. János és Korompay Klára. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest, 794–801.
Jakubovich Emi l – Pais Dezső 1929. Ó-magyar olvasókönyv. Danubia, Pécs.
Koch, Jens 2002. Hans Koch und die Firma Jacques Rosenthal. In: Angermair et alii: 208–213.
Korompay Klára 2024. A Leuveni kódex és az Ómagyar Mária-siralom sorsa a 20. században. Magyar Nyelv 120: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2024.1.1
Löffelmeier, Anton 2002a. Die Wurzeln der Rosenthals: Fellheim in Bayerisch Scwaben. In: Angermair et alii: 47–60.
Löffelmeier, Anton 2002b. Ludwig Rosenthal als „Wegbereiter” (1840–1928). In: Angermair et alii: 61–89.
Löffelmeier, Anton 2002c. Das Antiquariat Jacques Rosenthal. In: Angermair et alii: 91–135.
Rosenthal, Bernard M. 1977. Cartel, Clan, or Dynasty? The Olschkis and the Rosenthals 1859–1976. Harvard Library Bulletin 25/4: 381–398.
Rosenthal, Bernard M. 2012. Cartello, clan o dinastia? Gli Olschki e i Rosenthal 1859-1976. La Bibliofilía 114/1: 39–60.
Slive, Daniel J. 2003. Interview with Bernard M. Rosenthal. RBM A Journal of Rare Books, Manusripts, and Cultural Heritage. March 2003: 45–64. https://doi.org/10.5860/rbm.4.1.216
Vizkelety András 1986. „Világ világa, virágnak virága...” [Ómagyar Mária-siralom]. Európa Könyvkiadó, Budapest.
Vizkelety András 2004. Az európai prédikációirodalom recepciója a Leuveni Kódexben. Die Rezeption der europäischen Sermonesliteratur in „Löwener Kodex”. Fragmenta et Codices in Bibliothecis Hungariae 4. Akadémai Kiadó, Budapest.
Vizkelety András 2009a. Leuveni Kódex. In: Madas Edit szerk., „Látjátok feleim…”. Magyar nyelvemlékek a kezdetektől a 16. század elejéig. Országos Széchényi Könyvtár, Budapest. 224–225.
Vizkelety András 2009b. Ómagyar Mária-siralom. In: Madas Edit szerk., „Látjátok feleim…”.
Magyar nyelvemlékek a kezdetektől a 16. század elejéig. Országos Széchényi Könyvtár, Budapest. 226–227.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Klára korompay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Magyar Nyelv is a Diamond Open Access periodical. Documents can be freely downloaded and duplicated in an electronic format, and can be used unchanged and with due reference to the original source. Such use must not serve commercial purposes. In the case of any form of dissemination and use, Hungarian Copyright Act LXXVI/1999 and related laws are to be observed. The electronic version of the journal is subject to the regulations of CC BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons – Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives).
The journal permits its authors, at no cost and without any temporal limitation, to make pre-print copies of their manuscripts publicly available via email or in their own homepage or that of their institution, or in either closed or free-for-all repositories of their institutions/universities, or other non-profit websites, in the form accepted by the journal editor for publication and even containing amendments on the basis of reviewers’ comments. When the authors publicize their papers in this manner, they have to warn their readers that the manuscript at hand is not the final published version of the work. Once the paper has been published in a printed or online form, the authors are allowed (and advised) to use that (post-print) version for the above purposes. In that case, they have to indicate the exact location and other data of the journal publication. The authors retain the copyright of their papers; however, in the case of an occasional secondary publication, the bibliographical data of the first publication have to be included.